Today is May 5, 2025.
Let these words stand as a memorial of praise to just judges everywhere and reproach against the criminal mania that rules the city of Chicago, Illinois. Chicago’s influence is like a festering wound spreading infection to the whole body politic of the state, and spreading outward into the nation.
Fast Track Demolition
If any infrastructure was unsafe for the habitation of the eternal souls of the sons of men then the framework of Chicago’s legislated lawlessness would stand tottering at the top of the list, termite-ridden, foul, demon-haunted, a Zeller’s asylum of sorts; most inhospitable, it is fit to be destroyed.
Thank God, there have been some rational judges in both the state and nation. These judges had and have a vestigial humane conscience intact, though prevailing policies and procedures generally seem to be degrading, and fit for a Fast Track Demolition of sorts. Surely, the infernal political powers have been duly inspected and notified of impending ruin, and warned with stern echoes from heaven that if their deformed manner of being is not reformed or transformed in accordance with the Ordinances of God then heaven’s Fast Track Demolition shall set to work on earth.
On May 5, 1997, judges in the northern district of Illinois ruled on a case between:
Keith McKENZIE and Rev. Daniel Vinson, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
v.
The CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation, Richard M. Daley, individually and as Mayor of the City of Chicago, Cherryl Thomas, individually and as Building Commissioner of the City of Chicago, Ron McDermott, individually and head of the Fast Track Demolition Program of the City of Chicago, and John Does 1-20, Defendants.
Chicago’s first Latino judge, District judge Castillo, wrote this in his MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER:
In this lawsuit, the plaintiffs have raised various due process challenges to the validity of a Chicago city ordinance under which the defendants operate the Fast Track demolition program, claiming that they have been (or are about to be) deprived of their property without adequate notice or opportunity for a hearing….
Under the City’s current practice, a property owner enters a purgatory unmarked by any clear signs of progress or failure when he embarks on attempts to repair (or even enclose) his property. Although he may communicate his plans to the Fast Track office, no notice is taken of such communications. Fast Track employees provide him with no assistance in identifying necessary repairs, or in receiving feedback about whether his efforts are sufficient to forestall demolition. Even if his efforts are successful, he is not given any information about the City’s ultimate disposition regarding his property. And if he rehabilitates but does so too late (after the final Fast Track inspection), the evidence shows that the demolition contractor is likely to destroy the rehabilitated house. This court can easily imagine ways in which these confusion- and error-producing procedures could be remedied without unduly delaying demolition, if that is what is ultimately required. We are astonished that the City’s imagination has not produced a better system in this area than the present informal system which lacks any objective administrative standards…..
The plaintiffs claim that the City’s actions in demolishing various buildings through the Fast Track program violate the substantive aspect of due process because the City had no basis for the demolitions. They point to situations in which houses have been demolished even though the house had been substantially or completely repaired at the time of the demolition as evidence that the Fast Track program routinely results in unjustified destruction of houses. See Def. Exs. 102, 103; Wojcik Third Decl. ¶¶ 2, 3. The City also demolished Rev. Vinson’s building without performing an additional inspection, although it had assured Rev. Vinson that it would not. Twice, City inspectors photographed two different buildings in attempting to document a single building’s condition. Def. Exs. 27, 34. The City has admitted that it found “address inconsistencies” in three other files that warranted discarding those files and starting over on those properties. McDermott decl. ¶ 39(4). Moreover, McDermott testified that it was “very common” for the Fast Track program to get calls from upset owners after demolition asking “Why did you tear it down?” McDermott dep. at 3940.
To the glory of those judges, nearly 30 years ago, they ruled thus:
SCOPE OF THE INJUNCTION
The defendants shall refrain from ordering, authorizing, putting out for bid, or otherwise pursuing any demolition through the Fast Track program, or in any other manner implementing Chicago Municipal Code § 13-9-010 or 65 ILCS 5/11-31-1(e), until further order of this Court. Any Fast Track demolitions that have already been authorized, bid upon, or that are otherwise currently in the hands of contractors must immediately be halted, and the authorizations or contracts suspended.
Let us conclude this memorial of reproach by revisiting and chanting a variation on a theme of the former court:
Though justice Castillo in our story
Won a measure of honor and true glory
By saying Chicago practices erected a purgatory,
He could’ve done better, though he did well,
By cursing Chicago’s ordinances to eternal hell.
Acts in time flow into timeless heaven or perdition.
Lawless laws summon God’s Fast Track Demolition.
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/964/1183/1410117/
NEW PURITAN 
Karen Xtian missionizers promote how their God JeZeus prayed. A simple refutation to this religions propaganda nonsense.
Your fraudulent gospels, JeZeus does not discern the difference between “praying”–Tehillem from davening–“Torah blessings”. The Talmud of ברכות instructs that a “blessing” exists as an extension of swearing a Torah oath. A Torah oath, defines the k’vanna of the oath sworn בריתות sworn by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov by which the Avot cut a brit with HaShem to eternally create the chosen Cohen People from nothing by means of Av tohor time-oriented commandments.
Therefore a blessing requires the kabbalah abstract wisdom known as שם ומלך. The gospel fraud never once brought the שם השם לשמה anywhere in the NT. The first Sinai commandment the greatest of all Torah commandments NOT love – as the false messiah JeZeus taught. Why? Does a Jew do mitzvot לשמה או לא לשמה? This basic question defines how the first Sinai commandment, a commandment at all. The Talmud refers to this fundamental basis of this 1st Sinai commandment – applicable to all the other Torah commandments; explained through the משל metaphor, as expressed though the metaphor of: A Mountain hanging by a Hair.
The JeZeus fraud false messiah did not grasp, that Tefillah as a Torah, that this mitzva requires the dedication of the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the Heart. Rabbi Yechuda interpreted בכל לבבך within the language of tefillah דאורייתא – meaning the kre’a shma – as the avoda which discerns between the opposing spirits of Yatzir Ha’tov vs. Yatzir Ha’rah within the heart. He based this Mishnaic ruling upon the opening word of Torah בראשית, based upon the פרדס – רמז of ב’ רשאת, which translates as two beginnings. The aggadic story of the creation has two creation stories. These stories introduce the first cause of g’lut-exile as the inherit (think of Yaacov and Esau wrestling within the womb of Rivka) struggle between the Yatzir Ha’Tov vs. the Yatzir Ha’Raw within the “womb” of the heart. Hence the Talmud acknowledges that Tefillah a matter of the heart.
Whereas JeZeus prayed to some Father in Heaven. The term מלכותkingship: a metaphor wherein the משל king/מלך guides and directions the direction wherein the nation walks. The נמשל logical inference made upon this משל, the Oral Torah middot revealed to Moshe at Horev on Yom Kippur, these tohor middot – they define the drive or spirit which breathes life from within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart! This crucial error definitively proves the NT a Roman Protocols of Zion forgery.
Currently its the month of Elul. A Chassidic saying at this time: The King is in the field. The נמשל for this משל, Jews attempt to “remember” (ר”ה נקרא יום הזכרון) how the Sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב-assimilated Jews attempted to impose a substitute replacement theology wherein they referred to the revelation of the 1st Sinai commandment by the word אלהים. The avoda zarah gospel book John 1:1 declares the Word as god. Both substitution theologies define the sin of the Golden Calf; wherein HaShem threatened to make from the seed of Moshe the chosen Cohen people.
The Torah teaches that following the rebuke of the prophet HaShem made t’shuva and “remembered” the oaths sworn to Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. Hence the opening blessing of tefillah writes: אלהי אברהם אלהי יצחק ואלהי יעקב. HaShem made t’shuva. A completely different verb from the Xtian idea known as repentance. The Torah precedents for t’shuva: the father can annul a vow made by his minor daughter and the husband can annul a vow made by his wife. Hence a fundamental מאי נפקא מינא distinction made between t’shuva and repentance.
The Yom Tov of ר”ה revolves around the central axis of blowing the shofar. Tefillah, as a tohor time oriented commandment requires k’vanna. To blow a shofar require the exertion of air blown from the lungs. But to dedicate a blessing/oath of tefillah requires a dedication of the tohor middot (מלכות) of the Yatzir Ha’tov within the heart. Another huge מאי נפקא מינא fundamental distinction of k’vanna. Torah its deep. The two-dimensional NT Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zion counterfeit fraud, an utter abomination.
The Torah vision of Moshiach – a tohor time oriented commandment like and similar too shabbat – a tohor time oriented commandment. As the latter applies equally to all Jews in every generation to observe and keep so too and how much more so the former! The NT messiah fraud assumes that a lone individual can keep the mitzva of Moshiach. This flagrantly violates the revelation of the Torah at Sinai wherein all generations of the Jewish people accept the Torah.
Torah as common law stands upon the יסוד of precedents. Rabbi Yishmael explained the concept of precedent through calling them בנין אב in his 13 middot explanation of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס kabbalah of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev. During the entire month of Elul Jews daven a prayer known as Slichot, wherein we open the doors revealing the Sefer Torah and repeatedly cry out unto the 13 Oral Torah revelation of the 13 middot: ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון וכו.
Its rather interesting the רמז – which includes Gematria numerical values, 3 + 13 + 3 blessings defines the Order of the Shemone Esrei. This Order interpreted by the Rambam as 613. He learned 613 commandments from the Written Torah. The B’HaG rejected this simplistic reading of a רמז. He discerned that the opening book of בראשית, introduced the Av tohor mitzvot known as time oriented commandments. The next three books of the Torah שמות, ויקרא, ובמדבר introduced the secondary “precedent” positive and negative commandments which do not require k’vanna. And the last book of the Torah introduced the judicial mandate of the Sanhedrin common law lateral courtrooms, known as משנה תורה. Hence the revelation of the Torah at Sinai inclusive of all the Halachic mitzvot elevated through Aggada drosh of prophetic mussar unto Torah Av tohor time oriented commandments! Rabbi Yechuda the Nassi named his Six orders of Sanhedrin judicial rulings as משנה. The latter interpreted the intent of the Book of דברים as the mandate for common law Torah and Talmudic law.
LikeLike
The two schools of Shammai and Hillel debated often and agreed rarely but allegedly, around the time of the Bar Kokhba revolt (c. 132-135 A.D.), a voice from heaven chimed in to forever settle disputes between the two houses.
The Babylonian Talmud says,
“Rabbi Abba said that Shmuel said:
For three years Beit Shammai and Beit Hillel disagreed.These said: ‘The halakha [practice] is in accordance with our opinion,’
and these said: ‘The halakha is in accordance with our opinion.’
“Ultimately, a Divine Voice emerged and proclaimed: ‘Both these and those are the words of the living God.’ However, the halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Beit Hillel” (The Babylonian Talmud, Seder Moed, Eruvin,
ch. 1 “Mavoi” 13b).
The Jerusalem Talmud asks:
“Where was the divine voice heard?
Rebbi Bibi in the name of Rebbi Yoḥanan:
‘The divine voice came in Jabneh'” (Jerusalem Talmud, “Berakhot” 1:4).
What happened at Jabneh?
As the rabbinic literature says:
“The Synhedrion was at Jabneh between the two wars against the Romans and held there its first meeting when it was reconstituted after the persecutions that followed the war of Bar Kokhba” (199).
I’m afraid that the “divine voice” that “came in Jabneh” was nothing more than the majority vote of the Sanhedrin that met at Jabneh.
This “divine voice” (בְּבַת קוֹל; bat qol) can be translated literally as daughter of frivolity.
Though “Vox populi, vox Dei” is the mantra of the rabbis of world rabbledom, as a matter of fact the voice of The People is not the voice of God but is all too often merely the voice of frivolity born of frivolity or, worse, the voice of collective madness!
The Babylonian Talmud shows us how prevailing voices in Judaism twist the Law to equate majority vote with the voice of God… but it’s actually worse than that: majority vote is made to triumph over God, but only when it’s convenient. For example, in the written Law God said Israel “must not” follow a majority into doing evil (Ex. 23:2), but the rabbis interpret the verse as saying one must follow the majority vote:
“We pay no attention to a divine voice because
long ago at Mount Sinai You wrote in Your
Torah at Mount Sinai, `After the majority
must one incline’. (Ex. 23:2)” R. Nathan met
[the prophet] Elijah and asked him, ‘What
did the Holy One do at that moment?’ Elijah:
‘He laughed [with joy], saying, ‘My children
have defeated Me, My children have defeated Me’” (The Babylonian Talmud, “Seder Nezikin, Bava Metzia,” 59b).
Satan’s two ironclad laws of convenience and self-contradiction are at work here. Earlier, the “divine voice” is exalted as infallible authorization, adequate to establish Hillel’s opinions as the rule for how to practically apply the faith (ie, halakha), but in the case where the lawyers want to overrule God Himself, the lawyers conveniently “pay no attention to a divine voice.”
Practitioners of so-called “Judaism” acknowledge this contradiction and deal with it differently. For example, Dr. Sharon Shalom says:
“In the debate between Hillel and Shammai, the Sages rely on the intervention of the bat kol in deciding the halakhah, while in the story of Akhnai’s oven, the Sages reject the opinion of the bat kol, stating that ‘We pay no attention to a heavenly voice'” (From Sinai to Ethiopia:
the Halakhic and Conceptual World of
Ethiopian Jewry, by Dr. Sharon Shalom. Trans. by Jessica Setbon (Jerusalem: Gefen, 2016) intro).
How does a God-breathed Law written on stone progressively turn to fluid, or moldable like soft puddy in the hands of anti-Christ missionaries, then grow rigid again as occasion demands? We find hints in the Talmud where it is written:
“…. although God sold Torah to Israel, He rejoices in the sale and praises the object before its new owner” [Rabbi Yoshiyahu Pinto]”
(The Babylonian Talmud, “Berakhot 5a:8”).
The Lawyers of so-called “Judaism” are profoundly instructive. They show us the process by which lawlessness and disorder get sanctified as Law and Order, how inner darkness is rebranded as Enlightenment, how regression, suppression, and aggression, get rebranded as progress. They are they microcosm and archetype of the world-pestilence known as “lawyers” in general which, from the macroscopic view, devour justice the way a plague of locusts chew up ripe harvests. Indeed, they exemplify for us how literate men become bestial in the act of self-deification. They show us that the Old God must be demonized before Satan can rule the synagogue. The question remains: how? How?
Allegedly, by laughter and praise… and by sale!
The Lawyers say God laughed when they overruled and defeated Him by majority vote. They also say He rejoiced after His sale of the Torah to Israel who became the “new owner” of the Torah.
Certain rights and privileges come with ownership. Even Christ acknowledged this when He said:
“Am I not allowed to do what I choose with what belongs to Me?” (Matt. 20:15)
The Lawyers claim to own the Torah and, in consequence, they do what they choose with it; but they would not let the Lord of the Sabbath do good, heal, save, or sustain the lives of His hunted disciples with grain on the 7th day Sabbath that He Himself blessed and sanctified after Creating all that is seen and unseen in the 6 days of Creation. Never let such men use their manmade Traditions that masquerade as Divine Law to criticize, judge, and condemn you by for celebrating the Lord of the Sabbath on the true Lord’s day, the 7th day Sabbath (Col. 2: 8,16,17,22) but rather be “rooted and built up in Him and established the faith, just as you were taught, ABOUNDING IN THANKSGIVING” (Col. 2:7).
LikeLike
Your translation of בת קול utterly strange to me. What does “heavenly voice” mean? That’s a valid question. The dispute between Hillel and Shammai represents the dispute between the Defense Attorney vs. the Prosecuting Attorney in a Common law Sanhedrin courtroom. Torah common law comes from the Earth NOT from the heavens.
“The divine voice came in Jabneh’” (Jerusalem Talmud, “Berakhot” 1:4). Refers to the Sanhedrin Court! The term Elohim a reference to Sanhedrin justices.
The Latin phrase “Vox populi, vox Dei” translates to “The voice of the people is the voice of God.” The precedent for this opinion the p’suk from D’varim צדק צדק תרדוף. You cannot discern the difference between T’NaCH common law from Roman Statute Law. Hence you have no qualifications to comment upon Talmudic common law. Just that simple, no fancy dance’n.
In Exodus 23:2, God instructs Israel not to follow a majority into wrongdoing, emphasizing the importance of moral integrity over popular opinion. However, rabbinic interpretation often emphasizes the principle of following the majority in legal and communal decisions, which can lead to a perceived contradiction.
This interpretation suggests that while the written Law warns against the dangers of majority influence in moral matters, the rabbis apply the concept of majority rule to legal contexts, indicating a nuanced understanding of authority and decision-making within the Jewish tradition. This duality can be seen as a way to balance divine commandments with the practicalities of communal governance.
You attempt to criticize Baba Matzia 59b reflects the Xtian perversion of Law of God vs Law of Man utter and total nonsense. Torah faith spins around the central axis – pursuit of judicial justice which strives to make fair restitution of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B.
The Xtian avoda zarah puke prioritizes belief in some theological creed belief in this or that God made superior in priority over the righteous pursuit of judicial justice within the borders of the oath sworn lands sworn to the seed of the Avot.
“After the majority must one incline” … The perversion lies in the interpretation of Exodus 23:2, where God instructs Israel not to follow a majority into wrongdoing. The Talmudic narrative, where Elijah reports that God expresses joy over the people’s ability to interpret the law in a way that allows for majority rule, implies that human understanding and decision-making can sometimes supersede divine instruction.
This can be seen as a perversion because it raises questions about the integrity of moral and ethical standards. It suggests that the collective decision of the people, even if it leads to actions contrary to God’s commandments, can be viewed positively. This tension highlights the struggle between adhering to divine law and the practical realities of human governance, potentially undermining the seriousness of moral obligations as outlined in the Torah.
Torah faith stands upon the foundation precedent of Moshe vs. the Court of Par’o in the matter of beating Hebrew slaves for their rebellion of not meeting their quota of brick production. That Court – a vertical court. Meaning the State paid the salaries of the Justices of the Court and the prosecuting attorney of the Court. The Torah refers to this type of vertical court as “bribery”. Hence the Sanhedrin common law courts – lateral courts. The people of Judea paid a court insurance which maintained judicial courts when these court sat idle. When an issue of damages came before the court the convicted wicked person had the obligation to pay not only fair compensation of damages his actions inflicted upon the victim but also all court expenses.
Torah has no bi-polar God vs Satan theology. The metaphor/משל “Satan” refers to the Yatzir Ha’Raw spirit within the heart! In Torah and Jewish thought, there is no dualistic framework of a bi-polar God versus a Satan figure as seen in some other religious traditions. Instead, the term “Satan” is often understood metaphorically, representing the Yetzer Ha’Ra (the evil inclination) that exists within each person. This concept delves into the heart of the distinction between tohor Oral Torah middot vs tumah middot. Neither the NT or Koran ever addresses this fundamental distinction which drives as the heart and soul of Torah common law. Does a Jew do mitzvot לשמה Yes or No? JeZeus by contrast, when asked by his disciples answered that the greatest commandment is love. Faith Hope and Love but the greatest is Love. What a load of utter nonsense. Why? Because JeZeus never defined how the Torah defines the key term love anymore than did the Koran ever define how the Torah defines the key term “prophet”. Religious rhetoric of this type qualifies as tuma propaganda which aims to arouse the emotions of the Yatzir Ha’raw spirits within the heart.
The phrase “God sold Torah to Israel” can be seen as a metaphorical expression rather than a literal transaction. Neither translation either figurative or literal amounts to anything other than a tits on a boar hog. Talmud a common law legal system. To interpret Talmudic language requires bringing a similar case and interpreting the “home” case based upon the specifics of the precedent case. This wisdom skill Xtian theologians do not know or possess.
The people of Israel in point of fact do have a special relationship with the oath sworn brit of Sinai. Time oriented commandments create the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot from nothing! This concept stands unique to the common theories of Race and genetics. Each generation of Israel lives as “the new owners” of the Torah. Why because each generation of Israel has the oath brit obligation to pursue righteous judicial justice among our people.
The Torah – not a set of static dogmatic laws but a dynamic inductive reasoning which compares a current case heard before a court to prior similar cases earlier courts ruled upon. Hence the Torah functions as a living judicial court system which guides the moral and spiritual life of the community; but more important shapes and determines the culture and customs practiced by the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot totally independent from the cultures and customs practiced by the Goyim.
[[[The Lawyers of so-called “Judaism” are profoundly instructive. They show us the process by which lawlessness and disorder get sanctified as Law and Order, how inner darkness is rebranded as Enlightenment, how regression, suppression, and aggression, get rebranded as progress.]]] Tuma blood libel slanders on par with the Xtian Protocols of the Elders of Zion forgery! Human society which lacks law and order falls into anarchy and chaos.
LikeLike
Before I even fully read your reply, let me ask you: Do you actually believe that your God (or His angel/messenger/logos) manifested to Moses in the form of a physical bush that was dying (burning) yet lived (not consumed)?
If you insist that “God is not a man” then do you concede that He can manifest as a bush?
LikeLike
The prophet Bil’aam quoted as saying: “God is not a man that he should lie”. That’s straight from the 4th Book of the Torah, which apparently you have never read.
Torah prophets do not teach history. T’NaCH prophets command mussar. LOL your church does not even know what mussar refers to. Sloppy scholarship. A prophet commands mussar b/c mussar equally applies to rebuke the Yatzir Ha’Raw within the bnai brit hearts. Hence rabbi Yechuda interpreted בכל לבבך\לבבכם found in the first two paragraphs of tefillah from the Torah (JeZeus’s disciples did not know the basics of Torah and neither did their god. Tefillah a matter of the heart whereas JeZeus taught: Our father who is in Heaven.) Oooops sloppy scholarship.
Rabbi Yechuda interpreted the obvious Torah incorrect spelling of heart/לב. The tefillah for the Torah spells heart as לבב, rabbi Yechuda interpreted this Written Torah language (that’s what law all about, it defines unclear terms) as the opposing Yatzirot within the heart. Something comparable to Yaacov and Esau within the womb of Rivka.
Inductive logic compares Case/Rule to other but similar Case/Rule precedents. Greek deductive logic operates upon a static syllogism triangular reasoning deductive logic. So sloppy your church fathers never once attempted to distinguish the one logic system from the other! So sloppy – pathetic.
Torah does not command history. The Aggadic story of HaShem speaking to Moshe through a burning bush, aggadic mussar not physical history. LOL so sloppy. A 5 year old Jewish child knows this basic distinction! History places earlier generations on a pedestal like and similar to an idol. Mussar a tough to accepts rebuke, compares to a seed which spouts and grows within the Yatzir HaTov within the heart. Sucks being you.
LikeLike
In the name of El Elyon, I rebuke your idolatry. You have exalted ink on paper over Yah. You do not believe in God. If the Almighty were believed by you then He would be beloved by you, but He is neither.
You worship the words of mere men who do not truly eat from Torah as a tree of life; they have an Oral Torah which is a tree of the knowledge of good and evil. And their Messiah is the snake, whose mantra is, “Has God said? Has God said? Did God really mean this? Did God really do that?” You are beguiled by the serpent in who speaks in that cursed tree. Its fruit has left you spiritually dead. indeed, that selfsame serpent slithers about the kabbalist tree.
Your rabbis crown the serpent, and resemble the lords of Egypt who wore cobra crowns, but the Messiah that is foretold in the Written Torah shall swallow your magical and bewitching “Oral Torah” which is a lawless law that justifies the satanic initiation ritual of oral sex on freshly circumcised babies, and justifies pederasty with girls under 3 and boys under 9.
The penalty of 2nd Death hangs like a guillotine over all the sons of hell who exalt the Talmud of Mystery Babylon over the written Torah.
The snake who is nested and speaks in your Tree of the knowledge of spiritual death has made you doubt that God truly manifested in the burning bush. Surely and truly and literally the bush burned unconsumed by the same power that called forth from non-existence the burning sun at the center of our solar system.
Have faith.
Believe God.
The world died and resurrected in Noah’s day.
Sarah’s womb died and resurrected.
Abraham believed Isaac would be resurrected after being sacrificed.
Joseph underwent a sort of death and resurrection to his brothers who persecuted him. Indeed, his Hebrew brothers thought he was a gentile when they first encountered him as their Savior.
Likewise, the Jews persecuted Messiah ben Joseph (ie, Christ) and have considered him a “gentile” god for many centuries, but he is truly the savior.
It is a work of God, and only true work of God that can wipe away the gentile mask from Mashiach ben Joseph, and you will find that the Almighty has appointed him as the Savior, even though you rejected and persecuted him just like Joseph’s brothers persecuted him.
Repent of your sins.
Trust in God.
Kiss the Son of Man.
LikeLike
You do not know what El Elyon means. Your repukes mean nothing. Of course I do not believe in your dead God. Shoah guilt preaches love. LOL.
You do not know Hebrew and therefore know nothing of the Torah. Oral Torah revealed to Moshe at Horev on Yom Kippur. Messiah, an Oral Torah commandment. Confusing the creation story as history – utterly brain dead stupid.
LikeLike
משנה תורה קידושין אב משנה
On the opening sugya of this the first published commentary upon this specific Mesechta; in this opening public learning of the Talmud, my opening thesis stands and accuses the ראשונים חכמים of the Capital Crime דיני נפשות crime of עבודה זרה – the 2nd Sinai commandment. Based upon גט גירושין, an Av time-oriented mitzva from the Torah. Therefore (this word employs a רמז of swearing a Torah oath), denigrating an Av tohor time oriented Torah commandment prostituted to a rabbinic positive commandment which does not require k’vanna (קידושין the דיוק of גט גירושין), the av tumah perversion of T’NaCH/Talmudic משנה תורה\common law unto Greek/Roman statute halachic law. Avoda zarah statute law determines the posok halacha, based upon cults of personality, like as represented in the statute Tur and Shulkan Aruch codes, rather than Gemara halachic בניני אבות\precedents which serve to make a different perspective reading of the language of this the Av Mishna of קידושין. This sh’itta of Reshonim g’lut scholarship merits a direct Torah curse rather than a blessing. Therefore, this Talmudic commentary calls for a Sanhedrin common law court to judge this dispute made against Reshonim Talmudic scholarship upon the both the T’NaCH & the Talmud – accused of the At tuma דיני נפשות crime of avoda zarah — enforced by NaCH prophetic mussar prophets/police of Sanhedrin Court Torah mandated Constitutional authority to enforce judicial rulings made by the Federal Sanhedrin Courtrooms.
Obviously, to publicly call for the restoration of common law/Legislative Review of Reshonim statute halachic law openly blesses the Zionist success who rose our people out of the European ashes of Shoah, after that Wilderness generations Orthodox rabbinic spies melted the heart of that generations which resulted in the Torah plague curse, known as Chamberlain’s White Paper public betrayal of the Balfour Declaration. That this false oath, comparable to the floods which destroyed the generation of Noach, obliterated and caused the Sun to permanently set upon the British empire. That dead empire gone the way of the dead Assyrian, Babylonian, Roman, Islamic, Mongrel, Ottoman, Austria-Hungarian, Japanese, 3rd Reich, French, British, and USSR, defunct empires that together with the Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zionism NT forgery as dead as the trinity God created through the Nicene Council dogma decree of statute law, together with the Av tuma avoda zarah Allah Golden Calf God which translates the שם השם First Commandment Spirit Name unto the degraded אלהים word translation of Allah. Therefore, the Siddur openly instructs the mussar that Torah oaths can Create יש מאין, תמיד מעשה בראשית מלאכים. Av tuma avoda zarah profanes with the lie that theology and creeds can create Gods either through council or by way of Angels! The latter a perversion equal to profaning Av tohor time oriented Torah commandments unto positive rabbinic mitzvot which do not require k’vanna.
LikeLike
משנה תורה קידושין אב משנה
On the opening sugya of this the first published commentary upon this specific Mesechta; in this opening public learning of the Talmud, my opening thesis stands and accuses the ראשונים חכמים of the Capital Crime דיני נפשות crime of עבודה זרה – the 2nd Sinai commandment. Based upon גט גירושין, an Av time-oriented mitzva from the Torah. Therefore (this word employs a רמז of swearing a Torah oath), denigrating an Av tohor time oriented Torah commandment prostituted to a rabbinic positive commandment which does not require k’vanna (קידושין the דיוק of גט גירושין), the av tumah perversion of T’NaCH/Talmudic משנה תורה\common law unto Greek/Roman statute halachic law. Avoda zarah statute law determines the posok halacha, based upon cults of personality, like as represented in the statute Tur and Shulkan Aruch codes, rather than Gemara halachic בניני אבות\precedents which serve to make a different perspective reading of the language of this the Av Mishna of קידושין. This sh’itta of Reshonim g’lut scholarship merits a direct Torah curse rather than a blessing. Therefore, this Talmudic commentary calls for a Sanhedrin common law court to judge this dispute made against Reshonim Talmudic scholarship upon the both the T’NaCH & the Talmud – accused of the At tuma דיני נפשות crime of avoda zarah — enforced by NaCH prophetic mussar prophets/police of Sanhedrin Court Torah mandated Constitutional authority to enforce judicial rulings made by the Federal Sanhedrin Courtrooms.
Obviously, to publicly call for the restoration of common law/Legislative Review of Reshonim statute halachic law openly blesses the Zionist success who rose our people out of the European ashes of Shoah, after that Wilderness generations Orthodox rabbinic spies melted the heart of that generations which resulted in the Torah plague curse, known as Chamberlain’s White Paper public betrayal of the Balfour Declaration. That this false oath, comparable to the floods which destroyed the generation of Noach, obliterated and caused the Sun to permanently set upon the British empire. That dead empire gone the way of the dead Assyrian, Babylonian, Roman, Islamic, Mongrel, Ottoman, Austria-Hungarian, Japanese, 3rd Reich, French, British, and USSR, defunct empires that together with the Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zionism NT forgery as dead as the trinity God created through the Nicene Council dogma decree of statute law, together with the Av tuma avoda zarah Allah Golden Calf God which translates the שם השם First Commandment Spirit Name unto the degraded אלהים word translation of Allah. Therefore, the Siddur openly instructs the mussar that Torah oaths can Create יש מאין, תמיד מעשה בראשית מלאכים. Av tuma avoda zarah profanes with the lie that theology and creeds can create Gods either through council or by way of Angels! The latter a perversion equal to profaning Av tohor time oriented Torah commandments unto positive rabbinic mitzvot which do not require k’vanna.
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
התם דבמלחמה קאי דדרכו של איש לעשות מלחמה, ואין דרכה של אשה לעשות מלחמה. כתב לה בלשון זכר מתני’ אהדדי. לא קשיין. הכא דלגבי אשה קאי קתני לה בלשון נקבה. התם דלגבי איש קאי דדרכו של איש ליבדק ואין דרכה של אשה ליבדק.
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
No. Its the duty upon the woman to check that she has 11 tohor days without spots before going to the mikveh. Therefore its the דרכה של אשה ליבדק. In Jewish law, particularly in Hilchot Nida, women required to check for eleven clean days (tohor) free of any spotting before they can immerse in the mikveh. This is indeed considered part of דרכה של אשה ליבדק. Essential to clarify that women bear the primary responsibility for their own nida status. While men may guide or remind, the act of checking and counting the clean days is inherently the duty of the woman.
This distinction emphasizes the importance of personal responsibility in the observance of family purity laws. Women, not Men, bear this primary Torah responsibility.
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
דהא אשה נמי באונס מיטמאה. תני לשון זכר מ”ט? תני שלש משום דרכים ניתני דברים. וניתני שלשה משום דקבעי למיתני ביאה. וביאה דרך.
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
Unintentional Tumah – The mention of אשה נמי באונס מיטמאה refers to the concept that a woman, alas often also become tamai unintentionally. This highlights that women, like men, are subject to the laws of tohor and tuma, particularly regarding the status of nida, which has specific ramifications in Jewish common law.
Masculine Grammar (לשון זכר) – The phrase תני לשון זכר מ”ט? raises the question of why the laws are expressed in masculine form. This can lead to a discussion on the implications of language in halachic texts, which often use masculine wording even when referring to obligations that apply to both genders.
Three Reasons (שלש משום דרכים) – The response תני שלש משום דרכים ניתני דברים indicates that the discussion might categorize the concepts into three paths or aspects. This serves to clarify that laws can apply in different contexts or scenarios; complexities around halachic language, obligations of both genders, and nuances in the application of purity laws. . The section ושלשה משום דקבעי למיתני ביאה links these implications to the concept of ביאה (intimacy), indicating that discussion about the laws also has to do with the connections and relations between men and women.
Different Contexts – The laws in question may apply differently depending on the circumstances. For example, the same law might have various implications when applied to men versus women or within different relationships. Complexities of Language – The language used in Halacha can sometimes be nuanced, requiring careful interpretation to understand the intended meaning and application. Obligations of Genders – Certain laws may impose different obligations on men and women, which needs to be acknowledged in discussions of Halacha. Tohor laws: (The most complicated subject in the entire Sha’s according to my Rav Aaron Nemuraskii. Tohor vs. tuma delves into the different “spirits” which dominate the opposing Yatzirot within the heart! The sworn oath brit of Gilgal – the basis of the order of Rabbeinu Tam tefillen – the chosen Cohen people cut a sworn oath brit alliance only to do avodat HaShem dedicating Yatzar Ha’Tov tohor middot holy to HaShem לשמה.) These laws can change based on circumstances, such as the level of ritual purity required for different people or situations.
The mitzva דאורייתא של קידושין לשמה – obey the brit between the pieces oath that the seed of Avram shall number as the stars of the sky. The Avot the fathers of the chosen Cohen people. This unique people, created through observance of time oriented Av Torah commandments places the primary burden to educate the Cohen children born through this marital union to learn and understand the obligation sworn at Gilgal, the Rabbeinu Tam tefillen k’vanna, to do Avodat HaShem service only through the dedication of Yatzir HaTov tohor spirits from within our hearts לשמה.
Hence the laws of קידושין exclude Goyim by definition. 1. Goyim never accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai; both the New Testament Protocols of the Elders of Zionism forgery and the Koran dictated by the מלאך גבריאל – جبرائيل (Jibril) to Muhammad exactly/perfectly duplicate the sin of the Golden Calf Av definition of tuma avoda zarah. The Torah directly condemns all word translations which pervert the Divine Presence Spirit Name unto word translations for God. Nothing in the Heavens, Earth, or Seas comparable to the revelation of the Divine Spirit Name commanded לשמה at Sinai.
This passage exemplifies the structured way halacha discusses purity—acknowledging that both men and women have responsibilities while using language that could be historically skewed towards men. Our Gemara addresses complexities around halachic language, obligations of both genders, and nuances in the application of tohor laws. תני שלש משום דרכים ניתני דברים because 3 qualifies as a חזקה.
LikeLike
משנה תורה — קידושין
The style of the Gemara – difficulty answer. Why? Mishnah as blueprint, Gemara as rotation of facets. My father, to whom I referred to as a boy of 5 years of age as “Wild Bill Kerr”, based upon the TV series: “The Adventures of Wild Bill Hickok”. An American Western television series that aired from April 15, 1951, to September 24, 1958. Wild Bill Hickok, a legendary lawman and gunfighter known for his bravery and quick draw. Jingles P. Jones, Hickok’s comedic sidekick, providing humor throughout their adventures. Framed as set in the 1870s, focusing on the escapades of Hickok and Jingles as they fought outlaws and maintained law and order primarily around Fort Larabee.
My father taught me that a skilled lawyer does not really master his trade unless he can argue persuasively both sides: Prosecution and Defense. Up to this point in this commentary, made upon the opening sugya of קידושין, have framed myself as accepting the yoke of בית שמאי, the Sanhedrin Court prosecuting attorney. Having accused the רישונים חכמים of their intentional guilt, specifically their Av tuma avoda zara; which promotes Jewish assimilation and intermarriage with Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The consequence of this fundamental lack of יראת שמים, this Reshonim ערב רב caused the Torah curse of Amalek/anti-semitism\ to plague the generations of the Jewish people like as did the plagues afflicted Par’o and Egypt during the days of Moshe and Aaron and Miriam.
Shall now likewise accept the yoke of בית הילל, the Defense attorney of the Sanhedrin Court and defend both רמב”ם וכסף משנה. The classic Pairs define Talmudic judicial common law. Absolutely essential that my commentary actively attempts a fair defense of the chief רשע – Rambam. “The act of codification in exile – pikuach nefesh for Torah, not rebellion — a suspension of precedent to preserve the covenantal body until the judicial soul of mass aliyah to the reconquered homeland restored.”
Lacking a strong defense for this Av tuma רשע, this commentary on the Av Mishna of קידושין compares to only one hand clapping; the Salem Witch Trials! This said, its essential to lay out the most obvious flaw of the Rambam code; the failure of that רשע to follow the common law Halachic codes made by the B’HaG, Rif, Rosh, and most especially by the Baali Tosafot who ruled Rambam guilty and placed him into the din of נידוי in 1232.
The Baali Tosafot criticized Rashi’s commentary as functioning primarily as a dictionary rather than a common law commentary which interprets the multiple facet perspectives which defines both T’NaCH and Talmudic common law. Only twice in the whole of the Sha’s Bavli did the Baali Tosafot make mention of the Rambam, and in both those cases they challenged and disputed his posok halacha.
But a minority of Baali Tosafot scholars approved and supported the Rambam perversion of Talmudic common law – to assimilated Greek/Roman statute law – cult of personality dictates. (Ask a religious Jew why he keeps the halacha? His standard answer: Because its written in the Shulkan Aruch.) The SMaG, (Sefer Mitzvot Gadol), authored by Rabbi Moshe ben Asher in the 13th century. This Baali Tosafot halachic code organized it’s posok halachic rulings, based upon the rules established by Reshonim conventions. Imposed due to the harsh reality of the collapse of the Roman road system and armed Robin Hood robbers. The tumultuous political and social landscape prompted scholars to consolidate halachic knowledge and attempt to establish a reliable source of Jewish law. He organized his halachic code around the frozen/static 613 Rambam (rigid egg-crate literal orthodox Xtian reading of the language of their bible Creation story). His codification of Reshonim opinions served as the model whereby the Tur based and organized his own statute law code.
Due to the simple fact that the king of France, together with the Pope – catholic church, publicly burned all the Talmudic manuscripts in Paris 1242. In 1290 the Jews of England expelled; 1306, King Philip IV of France, also known as Philip the Fair, ordered the expulsion of all Jews from his realm. These two Tsunami-like Earthquakes utterly obliterated and destroyed the French common law Rashi/Tosafot sh’itta which studied the kabbalah of Rabbis Akiva, Yishmael, and Yosi HaGalili middot. From the Paris burnings to the Khmelnytsky massacres to the Shoah, Amalek reappeared in each generation — the penalty for assimilation and the forgetting the Sinai oath brit alliance.
The latter Tanna, his 32 rules expand rabbinic middot legal scholarship; they amplifies rabbi Yishmael’s 13 rules wherein the Holy Writing serve to amplify differing perspectives made to interpret the Books of the NaCH. The realtionship of the Gemara to the Mishna models itself after how the Holy Writings interpret the NaCH Prophets.
Here’s a brief list and explanation of this famous Tanna’s 32 middot. 1 Kal V’Chomer. A form of argument from minor to major. 2 Gzerah Shavah. A principle that draws parallels between similar terms or phrases in different contexts. 3. Binyan Av. The common law principle of precedents. The anchor of T’NaCH and Talmudic common law. 4. Shenei Ketuvim. Resolving contradictions between two biblical verses. 5. Tzarich L’Chatech. Requires clarification within a specific context. 6. Masar LaChaver. Transmitting a rule or principle to others. 7. Danny D’Rabi. Interpret a phrase based on rabbinical authority. 8. Chalom. A principle that allows interpretation based on dreams or visions. 9. Mikra. The textual basis for legal conclusions. 10. Davar SheBikdushah. A legal concept pertaining to sacred contexts. 11. Hekesh. A type of comparison that links two similar cases together. 12. Sefarim. Reference to books or scriptures that provide guidance. 13. Kavachomer from Torah. A derived legal principle that compares laws from the Torah to other laws. 14. Hekesh d’Rabbanan. A rabbinical comparison of legal interpretations. 15. Shema. Deriving laws that are evident in rules and practices. 16. Ribui U’Mi’ut. One of rabbi Akiva’s principles apart from rabbi Yishmael; inclusivity and exclusivity in legal terms. 17. Memashim. Interpreting terms based on similarity in context. 18. D’varim. Specific discussions within the context of Mitzvot. 19. Tanaim. Recognition of pluralism in opinions. 20. Ma’aseh. Examples that guide understanding or application of a principle. 21. Tuvaot. Philosophical principles based on faith or belief. 22. Kedushah. Principles pertaining to holiness and sacredness. 23. Chiddush. A new interpretation or novel legal ruling. 24. Omak. The principle of measuring depth or intensity in legal interpretations. 25. G’vul. Boundaries concerning laws. 26. Takanah Legal improvements made for community welfare. 27. Harsha. Interpretative techniques that adjust meanings based on context. 28. Shavah. A principle of equivalence or balance in law. 29. Edut. Laws based on testimonies and witnesses. 30. Mitzvot. Observance or fulfillment of commandments within Jewish law. 31. Machloket. The principles governing disputes and disagreements in interpretations of law. 32. Tamim. The concept of integrity and moral character in the practice of law.
My commentary relies extensively upon the rules established by Rabbi Yosi HaGalili. Yet no rabbi, other than Rav Nemuraskii – but of course – ever took the time to emphasize the absolute need to study and comprehend these 32 middot!
The supporters of the Rambam today negate not only the נידוי דין made by the court of Rabbeinu Yonah. But they, to my knowledge, due to the massive anarchy and chaos – resultant of this Civil War – which produced forced mass population transfers which effectively did not terminate till the Church three Century ghetto gulag decree. Which triggered the another tragic forced population transfer of Jews fleeing Western European church unjust tyranny to Eastern Europe. This mass population transfer contributed to the pogroms of 1648.
The 1648 Cossack Revolt, also known as the Khmelnytsky Uprising, led by Bohdan Khmelnytsky against the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Marked a pivotal moment in Ukrainian history and had enduring consequences for the region. Violent tensions boiled & brewed between the Polish nobility and the peasant Cossack feudal serfs. The latter, faced social and religious oppression, as the Polish nobility pitted aristocratic Catholics, opposed by peasant/serf Cossacks – Orthodox Christians. Peasant communist revolts against the land holding aristocrats, pretty much defines the history of Dark Ages, church oppression and slavery.
Bohdan Khmelnytsky, a prominent Cossack leader and military strategist, Khmelnytsky united various Cossack factions and sought to challenge Polish rule. This peasant/slave revolt began in the spring of 1648. Khmelnytsky attacked Polish forces and saw initial successes, capturing several key towns. This early victory, history remembers as the Battle of Zhovti Vody (May 1648), bolstered Cossack morale and led to further recruitment to his revolt. Another decisive victory the Cossacks enjoyed, which solidified Khmelnytsky’s power and territory, the Battle of Pyliavtsi (September 1648).
The uprising resulted in the Treaty of Zboriv (1649) between the Cossacks and the Commonwealth, granting significant autonomy to the Cossacks and recognition of Khmelnytsky’s leadership. The revolt led to increased Cossack autonomy and eventually contributed to the creation of the Cossack Hetmanate, a semi-autonomous region under Cossack control with considerable independence from Polish authority. The revolt, often seen as a cornerstone in the development of Ukrainian national identity – commemorated in Ukrainian history as a fight for independence and self-determination.
Not till the post WWII Catholic Pius XII inspired rat-lines which openly assisted Nazi war-criminals to escape standing trial, did the utter and complete barbarity of Church Nazi race-based guilt become so blatantly obvious. The Nazis proved that Xtian Europe eternally bears the mark of Cain. Post Shoah, no get out of jail free for Xtianity as a religion; nor for Islam who openly & publicly made open alliance to achieve the goals of Hitler – in both the 1948 and ’67 Israeli Independence Wars.
The opening defence of the רשע Rambam, based upon the 1232 נידוי ruled by French/Baali Tosafot rabbis in Paris. Outside the Land, Divine justice does not manifest through Sanhedrin jurisprudence — for HaShem Elohei Yisrael – bound by brit to the soil of the oath sworn lands. Having accused the Rambam as ha-rasha ha-gadol in Beit Shammai’s charge sheet, the Beit Hillel defense now must redeem him on grounds of intent (kavanah). Alas, this defense immediately collapses due to the Rambam’s bi-polar Sefer Ha’Mitzvot which totally ignores tohor time oriented commandments which absolutely both define and hence require — k’vanna. None the less, the essence of Gemara — that justice lives not in verdict but in the capacity to argue both sides with equal passion.
The obligation of Beit Hillel defense requires in-depth examination of the Rambam’s halachic rulings. The Rambam (1138–1204) lived through the Almohad persecutions in Spain and Morocco, when Torah academies were burned and communities forced to convert or die. In such times, the Rambam’s Mishneh Torah was not an act of rebellion but of triage — a desperate effort to preserve the body of law until neshamah chadashah could restore its soul. His code did not deny Torah shebe’al peh; it froze its surface in order to prevent total loss.
The Kesef Mishneh (R. Yosef Karo) later wrote: “He wrote a code not to uproot the Gemara, but to protect it, lest the generations forget even its bones.” The prosecution identifies codification with Avoda Zara, arguing that it transforms the living word into a fixed idol. Yet idolatry in Torah law is defined not by the form of worship but by intention — kavanah. The Rambam’s intention, as proven in his Introduction to Mishneh Torah, was not to replace the Oral Law but to “gather what is scattered” (le’asof hanidachim). Alas the Rambam replaced dynamic פרדס inductive logic with Greek syllogism deductive logic.
In his Introduction to Sefer HaMitzvot he writes: “I did not intend that one abandon the Talmud, for the Talmud is the root of all decisions.” Thus, the form of his writing — systematic, Greek-like — cannot be construed as Avoda Zara unless the intent actually qualifies as alien worship which the prosecution maintains. The burden of proof for idolatrous intent cannot stand in din Torah without testimony and motive. The prosecution claims that Rambam’s move from common law to statute code, violated the dynamic precedent system (binyan av). Yet Ezra HaSofer and the Men of the Great Assembly themselves wrote down the Tanakhic canon to preserve it post-exile. Codification – in crisis – perhaps qualifies precedent, & not rebellion.
R. Yosef Karo’s Kesef Mishneh perhaps understood not as blind allegiance but as judicial commentary — a defense brief of its own. He accepts Rambam’s framework but reopens the dialectic: where ever Rambam seems to rule against the Gemara, the Kesef Mishneh restores the dialogue of possible Gemara sources, but fails to bring the language of the Mishna as does the common law codes of the B’HaG, Rif, and Rosh. Does the Kesef Mishneh replicate what Beit Hillel does to Beit Shammai — not to overturn, but to temper judgment viewed from an entirely different perspective? Most definitely no.
The prosecution links Rambam’s rationalism to assimilation. Yet history shows that rationalism, in Rambam’s hands, perhaps served the opposite purpose: to rescue Judaism from the Aristotelian cults of barbaric Islam and Xtian Av tuma avoda zarah. In Guide for the Perplexed, Rambam dismantled the Greek metaphysical “gods” and reframed Torah theology in the language of the nations, to prevent the youth of his generation from apostasy. Is this לא תעשון כן לה’ אלהיכם in reverse — cleansing foreign ideas for Avodat Hashem? Again clearly No. The Rambam defense admits that he erred. However, his error limited only to method, to faith; in precision – not to loyalty, requires an עיון that this introduction can only suggest at this early stage of the trial.
The Ba’alei Tosafot indeed criticized his halachic method — a legal dispute within the precedent of the B’HaG, Rif codes? No the Rambam clearly favored systematic ease over common law judicial discipline. The Rambam’s מציאות השם radically differs from the Talmudic masoret which teaches that only the 12 Tribes of the Chosen Cohen people accepted the revelation at Sinai: the brit to continuously create the seed of the Avot through tohor time oriented Av commandments, starkly different from the Rambam opinion, embraced by the vast majority of assimilated Jews who themselves stood in absolute terror from Xtian & Islamic Av tuma avoda zarah Creed beliefs in some Universal God. G’lut Jewry endured a nightmare, an absolute panic of dread & fear. Therefore they abandoned the Sinai revelation limited to a Tribal local god.
The Cherem against the Rambam in Montpellier arose not from halachic analysis but from this precise horror experienced by the assimilated Jews of Spain. Their crude knowledge of Torah faith as common law judicial justice, utterly overwhelmed by their absolute dread of philosophy’s encroachment on the purity of common law judicial faith; that seals the focus of the oath alliance upon the Sinai brit that touches the eternal creation of the Chosen seed of the Avot through time oriented tohor commandments.
Clearly the Rambam’s vision of what defines the foundation of prophecy, stands fundamentally apart from the Talmudic definition which understands prophets as persons who command mussar to all generations of the chosen Cohen people. Its this prophetic mussar which the Aggada of the Talmud defines the k’vanna of rabbinic halachot throughout the Talmud employs to plant mussar seeds within the Yatzir Ha’Tov; elevates positive rabbinic commandments to Av tohor time oriented commandments based upon the Oral Torah 13 middot revealed at Horev; the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס inductive dynamic reasoning akin to the variables of Calculus. The priority of pursuit of judicial common law justice vs. theological belief in a Universal omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence God — starkly different than outside of the land of Israel there exists no God. The restrictions on the Sanhedrin courtrooms obeys the model of Tribal HaShem as God of the Chosen land.
The Talmud fundamentally rejects speculation attempts to grasp the nature of the Gods as “better such person never born”. Greek philosophy’s influence upon Spanish Jewry had clearly overshadowed the shade cast by the Tree of Life. Jewish philosophers, without shame, debated the nature of God’s existence, on par with Xtian and Muslim avoda zarah believers. The Zohar’s kabbalistic mysticism promoted the large and small face of God Av tuma narishkeit.
Avoda zarah’s metziut of God as experienced through the absolute prioritization of faith in some theological belief system – artificial creed, spiritual practices, and personal encounters with the Divine. Miracles and divine providence play a significant role in affirming the existence of a Universal rather than a small tribal god. Descriptions of God mirror the sin of the Golden Calf word translations for שם השם. Rambam’s metziut of God encompasses a complex assimilation of philosophical inquiry, theological discourse, and personal experience. Understanding God’s existence requires engaging with both rational arguments and the richness of spiritual and communal experiences.
In his Introduction to the Yad Rambam writes: “My purpose is to gather the scattered, that the weary may find rest in one accessible structure.” None the less Yosef Karo failed to grasp that the sugyot of the Talmud a) require respect in and of themselves; b) serve as common law precedents to re-interpret the original language of both the Gemara sugya itself, together with the Mishnaic language – viewed from a completely different facet perspective.
Some argue that R. Yosef Karo’s Kesef Mishneh transforms the Rambam Yad from idol-statute into case law in exile — a portable court for a dispersed people. In the early 2000 sat with 70 other anointed judges in an attempt to restore Sanhedrin courts. Alas the vast majority of my peers perceived the Rambam Yad served as the ideal model by which we could re-establish Sanhedrin common law courtrooms! Does the Kesef Mishneh stands as the Rambam’s second breath — the return of neshamah chadashah into the vessel that had been frozen by necessity? Clearly no.
Rambam’s Guide dismantled the idolatries of his age — Aristotelian eternity of the Earth, Islamic predestination, and Xtian incarnation — translating Torah theology into the language consoled Goyim hostility, so that Jewish youth might survive their Christ-killer slanders. Assimilated Spanish Jewry had long ago actually embraced the concept of avoda zara altered and restricted/limited to the Goyim concept of actual physical or historical idol worship. Aristotle’s philosophy posited an eternal universe, implying that the world has no beginning or end. For Rambam, this notion contradicted the creation narrative in the Torah, where God creates the world at a specific point in time. But he failed to grasp the essence of בראשית as the introduction of tohor time oriented Av commandments vs the תולדות מצוות which do not require k’vanna.
In certain Islamic philosophies, there is a strong emphasis on predestination, where God’s will determine all events. This concept raises questions about free will. Assimilated Rambam confused the Centuries later Protestant – Calvin’s ‘free will’ – with the Talmud’s ירידות הדורות domino/ripple effect. The Rambam failed to grasp that Islam’s strict Monotheism Universal God theology uproots the 2nd Sinai commandment. Hence the Guide actually embraces the error of monotheism as the nature of God; a direct violation of the Mishna which warns man not to contemplate upon that which exists above, below, or behind the humanity of Man. Converting Greek philosophy re-labelled as Jewish philosophy, serves only as revisionist history – holocaust denial – on par with the modern-day UN declarations of a genocide in Gaza.
LikeLike
An attempted defense for the רמב”ם וכסף משנה.
Intend to employ עין משפט נר מצווה as my guide to study and compare the language of the Yad and Karo’s commentary.
הלכות אישות: פרק ראשון הלכה ב: וליקוחין אלו – מצות עשה של תורה הם.
כסף משנה: פ”’א: ב ובאחד משלשה דברים וכו’. בביאה ובשטר מהתורה ובכסף מדברי סופרים. Avram’s acquisition of Sarah’s grave serves as a Torah precedent for כסף. The legal validity of Meshikah depends on the intention behind the act. The person must demonstrate a clear intention to acquire what they pull toward themselves. Yibum, meshikah, and kesef all require k’vanna. K’vanna the pre-condition which sets apart זימן גרמא מצוות הם עומדת נפרד בפני עצמן תורה תולדות מצוות – (הם קום ועשה, ושב ולא תעשה) התולדות מצוות האלה, הם לא צריך כוונה. לא כן זימן גרמא מצוות, שנזקוק כוונה.
Avram’s acquisition of Sarah’s grave serves as a Torah precedent for כסף, which the כסף משנה acknowledges. The legal validity of Meshikah depends on the intention behind the act. The person must demonstrate a clear intention to acquire what they pull toward themselves. Yibum, meshikah, and kesef all require k’vanna. K’vanna the pre-condition which sets apart זימן גרמא מצוות as Av tohor Torah commandments. Karo attempts to explain the language of the Rambam: ובכסף מדברי סופרים., Karo recognized the difficulty in the language of Rambam; he writes וכל דבר הנלמד באחת מי”ג מדות הוי דבר תורה.
Yet Karo like Rambam, both men failed to discern the distinction between time oriented commandment from secondary positive and negative commandments. Herein separates the B’HaG order of Torah commandments, he held that if a Jew does rabbinic commandments employing prophetic mussar as the k’vanna of his Yatzir Ha’Tov within his heart, that these mitzvot become time oriented commandments – from the Torah! The Rambam went so far as to even mock the B’HaG opinion. The B’HaG learns tefillah דאורייתא as קריא שמע. Whereas the Rambam erroneously held that tefillah דאורייתא as Shemone Esrei, based upon the RambaN’s critique of the Rambam 5th positive commandment.
The purpose of the Oral Torah/פרדס revelation of the י”ג מדות they interpret the k’vanna of av tohor time oriented commandments. Torah commandment not enchained, much less so imprisoned by the literal words of the Torah itself. Karo wrote: הרי דלארבע טוטפות קרי דברי סופרים אע”פ שהם דאורייתא. The Gemara of מנחות יש מחלקת if one says one or two blessings. It appears to me that the dispute between the Order of tefillen between Rashi and Rabbeinu Tam centers on this very same Gemara dispute. Tefillen like a sefer Torah in the matter of swearing oaths; the Order of Rashi tefillen reflects the oath sworn at Gilgal, whereas the Order of the Rabbeinu Tam tefillen remembers the oath sworn at Sh’Cem in the days of Yehoshua. All time oriented Torah commandments absolutely require prophetic mussar derived through Aggadic Midrash דרוש upon the T’NaCH primary sources.
The foundation of tohor Torah scholarship, scholars stand on the foundation which discerns the distinction between Primary from secondary or lesser source authorities. Karo treats outside, off the dof, precedents as if they serve as a deductive syllogism of logic. The flaw of statute law avoda zarah assimilation, it fails to respect the kabbalah of פרדס Case/Din rulings compared to other Case/Din judicial rulings in order to view the Case before the Court view from a completely different perspective. Karo’s logic – flat, it fails to grasp the BIG PICTURE depth.
רמב”ם: וליקוחין אלו הן הנקראין קידושין או אירוסין כפי בנהיית מעשה. ואשה שנקנית באחד מג’ דברים אלו היא הנקראת מקודשת או מאורסת.
Interesting, no mention of the sworn oath alliance the baal swears before both two kosher witnesses and a minyan of ten men. Ten men learns from the 10 מרגלים whose false oaths caused the Wilderness Generation, the Generation which accepted the Torah לא שמה at Sinai to have no portion in the world to come!
Time oriented commandments absolutely require the dedication of the Yatzir HaTov spirit within the heart to commit to sanctify tohor middot by how one behave in the future with his family and people. This Av Torah commandment directly bound, (picture Akedah) to the 1st Commandment שם השם לשמה of Sinai. The posok over-simplification made by the Rambam cannot see the forest through the trees! The Rambam together with his yes-man utterly fails to tie in the Torah precedent of the brit cut between the pieces wherein childless Avram cut a sworn alliance that the Spirit of HaShem would forever quicken the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the hearts of the chosen Cohen people created from nothing by means of doing time oriented Av Torah commandments which require prophetic mussar of the 13 middot which a man dedicates to צרף נכסף tohor middot to future social interactions with his family and people in the oath sworn lands in order to pursue the faith of judicial justice to restore shalom among and between our people.
The mitzva of קידושין a man dedicates to educate his future born children in the Torah faith of צדק צדק תרדוף. The k’vanna of the mitzva of קידושין to raise up the Avot seed of the chosen Cohen people from generation to generation. This absolute fundaments the flat deductive logic of the כסף משנה and the practical realism of the Rambam completely miss the boat all together. The ירידות הדורות generated consequent to av tuma avoda zarah worshipped by these two most influential rabbis, that all down stream Yeshiva education failed to catch and correct this bumbling fundaments error.
פ”ד:א אין האשה מתקדשת אלא לרצונה והמקדש אשה בעל כרחה אינה מודשת. אבל האיש שאנסוהו עד שקידש בעל כרחו הרי זו מקודשת? Does rape qualify? The prophet Natan’s curse of Civil War, following David’s failure to judge the case of the Baal of Bat Sheva with justice, resulted in a son of David raping his half sister. This triggered a catastrophic Civil War wherein Av Shalom publicly raped king David’s wives in a tent set upon a high hill.
Because Rambam’s juvenile statute code failed to link his halachic rulings to a specific Mishna, the מגיד משנה assumed the genesis for this Halacha as פ”ק דקידושין דף כ. Karo like all the down stream ירידות הדורות generations failed to discern the Common law halachic codes which made a משנה תורה of Gemara halachot back to re-interpret their Home Mishna; Karo never affixed the Primary Reshonim sources of B’HaG, Rif, or Rosh common law which linked the halachot learned from a Gemarah as the basis to re-interpret the language of the Mishna based upon viewing that language from a completely different perspective. Consequently none of the post Rambam super commentaries ever corrected the chief flaw of Rambam’s statute law codification.
Students in the Yeshiva world today, they don’t know that משנה תורה means Common law/Legislative Review. Never taught that בנין אב refers to common law precedents! The error of statute law avoda zarah, it destroys the foundations upon which stand T’NaCH and Talmudic common law. It ritualizes halachic observance utterly oblivious to how the Gemara makes a depth analysis of the language of the Mishna. Post the Rambam Civil War Jewish rabbis behaved like dogs who continually chased after their own tails. T’NaCH stands divorced from Talmud. Talmud stand divorced from the Siddur. Kre’a Shma stands divorced from tefillah!
Rambam and Karo, by codifying halacha as statute rather than precedent, severed mitzvot from prophetic kavanah; thereby they converted the Oral Torah’s living Cohen oath brit alliance unto a dead legislative creed system of belief—a form of avodah zarah that worships words rather than pursues judicial fair restitution of damages to build trust and shalom among our people.
LikeLike
משנה תורה — קידושין.
The Talmud “Framers” organized this codification of Great Sanhedrin judicial rulings through use of a semicolons which separate and easily identify one sub-chapter from another sub-chapter.
In the English language, a semicolon, most commonly used to link two independent, yet closely related clauses holding similar ideas or thoughts viewed from the different fixed perspectives. This concept reflects how witnesses perceive and interpret key yet subtle distinctions in a דיני נפשות murder trial.
By contrast the סדר יסודי built around the distinction between either a פ – פרק או ס – סוגיא in the Chumash. Whereas the organization יסודי of T’NaCH literature employs an void empty space gap which separates one sugya from another. In this latter instance, the authors and their descendants of the New Testament Protocols of the Elders of Zionism counterfeit fraud, ((By their fruits you shall know them)), perverted their bible sophomoric mistranslations into an order of Chapters and verses. Changing the “order” of a communicated idea directly compares to tuma propaganda rhetoric blood-libel slanders.
The difference between the common law commentators on the Talmud: B’HaG, Rif, Rosh, Baali Tosafot – the Big Four – from the statute law corrupters of judicial common law unto religious ritual religious observances, the disgraceful “all others post the Rambam Civil War” Reshonim, Acharonim, and Modern scholars — all these ירידות הדורות post Rambam Civil War generations, they totally ignore the cold hard fact that ORDER serves as the הגיונות יסודי – change the “order” of an idea and you get a different idea: GOD vs. DOG. Just that simple, no fancy dance’n.
The perverted Rambam statute law radically changed the Order יסודי wherein the Gemara sugyot have an ordered, purposely edited direct connection to a specific Mishna. The halachot which the Gemara introduces serve as judicial witnesses which permits down stream generations to view the language of the Mishna viewed from a fixed sugya perspective as opposed to another, slightly different fixed sugya perspective.
The statute religious ritual halachic codifications shattered this ordered Talmudic “mirror” into thousands of sharp shards that the framers of this Tannaim vs. Amoraim Mishna/Gemara “mirror” never intended. The Talmud originally intended to serve as a model for common law judicial courtrooms based upon a Torah written Constitutional mandate to achieve the faith of צדק צדק תרדוף. The Reshonim and later g’lut numb-skulls confused religious ritualism of halachic observances as equal to or even superior than the Torah faith to pursue judicial justice within the borders of our oath sworn home land! The disgrace of converting Judaism to resemble orthodox Xtianity or Islam, g’lut religious fanatics travel to Israel and smugly inform Israelis that they live in g’lut just as do American or whatever – Jews.
King Shlomo triggered another ירידות הדורות domino ripple effect when instead of establishment of Federal Sanhedrin common law courtrooms within the borders of his kingdom, king Shlomo pulled the Rambam stunt, and built his copy duplication of Goyim Temple/Cathedral buildings. The Book of מלכים mocks the wealth and prosperity which thrived during the “Golden Age” of king Shlomo, the avoda zarah worshipping רשע. The foundation of Civil War among a people – injustice and bureaucratic corruption! Civil War pursued King David and all generations of his descendants who presumed the crown of kingship defined the k’vanna of Moshiach! Bat-shit crazy stupid. Equal only to the JeZeus false messiah Roman counterfeit propaganda. The mitzva of Moshiach stands on the בנין אב יסודי of Moshe anointing Aaron and his sons as the Moshiach. Korbanot dedications require the k’vanna of צדק צדק תרדוף. Remembering the redemption from Egyptian slavery emphasizes the judicial oppression exorcised by the court of Par’o.
Israel delivered from Egyptian judicial oppression not to become frumm and blindly follow ritual halachic cult of personality religious rulings made by either a Reshon or Aucharon or modern religious “authority”. Religion not dependent upon the brit oath sworn lands. An examination of Reform Judaism leaders who declared “Berlin as their New Jerusalem” conclusively proves this point beyond a shadow of a doubt. Only within the borders of an independent Jewish homeland can Jews righteously pursue righteous judicial legislative review of statute laws passed by a Knesset Parliament!
The people requested a king from the prophet Shmuel so that he could lead them out to war against our enemies. The anointing of David as Moshiach prioritizes his role in the government function of establishment of foreign policy strategic and tactical objectives. Contrast the Sanhedrin courts whose jurisdiction restricted only to & within the borders of the Jewish state. Understanding the k’vanna of Legislative review as the Torah Constitutional mandate of משנה תורה, requires making subtle distinctions. ביקורת חקיקתית vs. סקירה חקיקתית. The former preferrable over the latter concept, because it emphasizes the required need for evaluation and\or critique wherein judicial courtrooms committed to punish the wicked and fairly compensate the innocent for damages suffered.
Disputes, fights, arguments all these verbs define the spirit of the tuma Yatzir within our hearts. It began with Chava vs. the serpent and the children produced by Adam and Chava. This recurring central theme of the Torah best expressed through the metaphor of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil vs. the Tree of Life and the Gemara of קידושין. A blessing requires שם ומלכות, not as some frumm (Yiddish) religious ritual worship of words printed in a Siddur! But rather שם – the dedication of tohor middot within the Yatzir Ha’Tov and מלכות\מלאך, the dedication of tohor Oral Torah spirits first revealed to Moshe at Horev; by means of swearing a Torah oath through making a “blessing”. Herein separates blessings from saying praises as expressed through reading Tehillem prayers.
Tefillah vs prayer – the two not the same. Impossible for a surgeon to cut out a tumor within a diseased critical organ within the body while wearing boxing gloves! Statute halachic law codes, starting with the Rambam’s av tuma avoda zara, places boxing gloves on the hands of Talmudic surgeons of common law. The oath created מלאך concealed within the details that establish Life or Death/tohor or tuma\Blessing or Curse.
Rav Aaron Nemuraskii, my rav, repeatedly warned me that the subject of tohor & tuma – the most complex & difficult subject the Sha’s addresses. The prostitute whores, New Testament and Koran, make no reference whatsoever to the distinction between tohor tuma spirits in eternal conflicts within the heart. Avoda zara substitutes belief in theologically created Creed Gods for the dedication of dominant tohor spirits which cause the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart to prevail as the dominant set of spirits. This unique spirituality totally alien to av tuma avoda zara; specifically in this examined case … the religious puke of the Rambam’s statute law perversion of Talmudic judicial common law. Child rape does not qualify as קידושין.
Admitted that during the times of the T’NaCH, a father could sell his minor daughter without her consent. But the Rambam 2nd halacha quoted on this current sugya, failed to make this critical distinction. A lot of water has gone under the bridge. Today Jewish Ashkenazi custom does not permit a man to marry multiple wives. The grossly over-simplified Rambam halachic ruling which permits child rape, an utter abomination. The language of our sugya debates grammar gender debates as a means to validate that women share equal rights together with men. Clearly the current generations we live in today hold radically different values than did the generation of the Rambam. Statute law compares to a frozen ritual stamp. But seasons change and frozen ice eventually thaws and flows under the bridge. פרדס logic dynamic, syllogism logic static. The רשע Rambam statute law code blew out the Hanukkah lights of freedom. Jewish Independence within the borders of the oath sworn lands defines the miracle of Hanukkah celebrated by generations who dedicate to study the Torah limited only to reliance upon the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic inductive reasoning.
This theological flaw made by all religions which promote belief in av tuma avoda zara – they rely upon deductive Greek syllogism logic; their framers therefore substitute a wicked “Devil” as their replacement theology for tuma middot. The latter tuma spirits empowers the Yatzir Ha’Raw within the heart to prevail over the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. The Divine tohor middah אל continuously rebukes the Yatzir Ha’Tov to remember the sin of the Golden Calf. Wherein the ערב רב שאין להם יראת שמים, these assimilated and intermarried Israelites, they exchanged אלהים for the רוח שם השם לשמה. Avoda zara, by definition worships words as God, like as stated in the opening verses of the gospel of John. The righteous who develop their Good Name reputations/יראת שמים\ they forever abhor the avoda zara of worshipping words as either Gods or prayers directed to God(s), by saying word Divine Names.
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
וביאה איקרי דרך. (משלי ל) ודרך דבר בעלמה.
This verse often understood as 1. “The way of an eagle in the sky.” – This is often interpreted as expressing the mystery and wonder of nature. 2. “The way of a serpent on a rock.” – This illustrates the cleverness and stealth of the serpent. 3. “The way of a ship in the middle of the sea.” – This highlights the vastness and complexity of navigation. 4. “The way of a man with a maiden.” – This reflects human relationships and the complexities involved in love.
Clearly in the larger contexts of our Gemara, the sages bring משלי ל:יט to express the forth interpretive option. But פרדס logic does not compare to syllogism deductive logic – not by a long shot. The Holy Writing of the NaCH, they serve as a similar Gemara commentary to its permanent Mishna. The Holy Writing make a different perspective depth analysis of a comparative sugya within the Books of the Prophets!
The discipline of Talmudic common law scholarship absolutely requires without exception no “over-simplifications” of deep complex tohor middot spirits wherein the opposing Yatzirot compete to prevail within the bnai brit hearts. Oral Torah always addresses the revelation of the 13 middot לשמה revealed to Moshe at Horev after the sin of the Golden Calf. The latter remembered as an arrogant attempt to create God out of the midst of Fire to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai just 40 days prior. Avoda zara an av tuma evil spirit within the Yatzir Ha’Raw within the heart precisely because it continually attempts to create Gods using theological creeds or in the case of the Koran abomination an imaginary rhetoric propaganda Angel.
Torah common law learn T’NaCH Primary Sources through פרט\כלל Oral Torah logic – just that simple. No fancy dance’n. The Hebrew T’NaCH retains, despite Xtianity’s revisionist bible translation attempts to remove and change the Order of sugyot. Sugya integrity defines the discipline of both T’NaCH and Talmudic honest and real scholarship as opposed to and contrasted by the false Dof Yomi fraud. Common law simply not read like some New Testament/Koran Harry Potter book of fiction. פרדס logic dictates that down stream generations make a דרוש search for at least one בנין אב precedent. The Rambam word translation tossed salad perversion of Talmudic common law which stands upon making a דרוש research for comparative precedent cases directly compares to the puke opinion that child rape qualifies as kosher קידושין.
The small sugya which contains משלי ל:יט resembles הושע ב: יח-כב. Greek deductive syllogism logic simply not capable of learning this inductive reasoning which defines פרדס logic which trains students of T’NaCH/Talmudic common law to make a דרוש research for similar precedents. This פרדס Torah wisdom, completely alien to Rambam’s replacement theology which organized Talmudic halachot into egg crate deductive reasoning static and fixed legal categories. Rabbinic Judaism fumbled the ball. They failed to catch the Rambam error and correct it. Consequently, following the victory of the Tzeddukim Rambam Civil War, Orthodox Judaism went completely of the דרך.
T’NaCH/Talmudic פרדס logic scholarship demands making a דרוש research, first for a דברים\משנה תורה בנין אב, followed up with (starting with בראשית) a second Torah precedent search. Herein defines the proper discipline of Talmudic scholarship which continuously learns both the Talmud and the T’NaCH through a sacred קידושין common law relationship. Post the Rambam civil war, the perverted Yeshiva world divorced Talmudic scholarship from T’NaCH scholarship just as did the Rambam’s puke code divorced Halacha from its Aggada; a loom has its opposing warp weft threads and the Talmud weaves the “garments” of the culture of the chosen Cohen people.
A דברים\משנה תורה דרוש בנין אב … דברים יז:א — לא תזבח לה’ אלהיך שור ושה אשר יהיה בו מום כל דבר רע כי תועבת ה’ אלהיך הוא. Child rape a Torah abomination! A ספר בראשית דרוש בנין אב: בראשית כא:כב-לד. The mitzva of קידושין compares to the brit which Avraham swore with Avi-Melech. Avraham set aside 7 sheep and קידושין celebrates שבעה ברכות.
ודרך גבר בעלמה כן דרך אישה מנאפת. This phrase smells like Rambam’s child rape qualifies as קידושין utter narishkeit. הא תינח ביאה כסף ושטר מאי איכא למימר משום ביאה The Gemara discusses different means through which marriage can be validly initiated. Our Gemara questions the act of intercourse as a legal form of קידושין. Where do the three ways of “acquisition” overlap?
What does a man “acquire” through קידושין? The woman neither a slave nor a whore as Yechuda perceived Tamar. Regardless of the method, there has to be mutual consent and intent to establish a marital relationship. In all cases, both parties must agree to the terms of the marriage. What “lasting union” established through any of these over lapping ways to “acquire”? Intercourse alone, especially today, not sufficient to sanctify the Torah mitzva of קידושין. This unique mitzva does not apply to Goyim who rejected the Torah revelation at Sinai. Solid proof that the mitzva of קידושין more than simply a rabbinic mitzva.
Under what conditions can intercourse alone create a binding agreement? The opening question raised, “What does a Man ‘acquire’ through the mitzva דאורייתא of קידושין? Answer: A man acquires title to the נפש עולם הבאה from this woman. Meaning, the Man acquires title to the name of the children born into the future world to come! The precedent for this oath brit acquisition which the mitzva of קידושין precisely duplicates … the oath sworn at the brit cut between the pieces. Tohor time oriented commandments possess the holiness to create יש מאין the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot. Goyim cannot reproduce the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot.
Therefore the mitzva of קידושין actively entails both two kosher witnesses and a minyan of 10 men. The latter required to swear a Torah oath. Therefore should a רשע divorce his wife and refuse to give her her required גט which returns her נפש עולם הבאה, and therein shatters the קידושין acquisition. If a רשע profanes his oath sworn to the woman, that woman can ask a בית דין to decree the din of נידוי upon that רשע which duplicates through a דיוק the ‘new creation’ of a Ger Tzeddick. This permits the בית דין to retro-actively annul the קידושין and free that “chained” woman to raise Cohen seed of the Avot from a more worthy man.
The Rambam’s shallow over simplified statute law code failed to grasp the fundamental basics which define the Torah time oriented commandment of קידושין. The groans of agunah women, chained to a fate worse than child rape, this eternal guilt condemns the arrogance of the Rambam false posok halacha.
LikeLike
Be concise:
Blood libel…
1. Why would Yah ban Israel from blood drinking if it was an impossibility?
2. When a mohel sucks blood from fresh circumcisions (or your women chew/eat the cut skin for good luck) do you think the mohel ever accidentally swallows a drop?
3. In some cases, the kids contract sexually transmitted diseases from the mouth of the mohels and the kids die. Do you think the mohels (who killed the kids by giving them STDs after Satanic ritual oral sex) originally caught the STD from sex with girls under 3 years old or boys under 9, for which the Talmud grants impunity?
4. Yeshua died as Messiah Ben Joseph.
Yeshua will return as Messiah Ben David.
He will purge Israel of rebels. Do not forsake the very mercy your soul needs.
LikeLike
Question #1 Absurd. Living Blood comes from the severing of the artery and vein going to and from the brain. This blood called: “living blood”. This blood the Cohen throws upon the horns of the altar. Rabbinic blood, like the blood contained within the liver. The liver full of blood. However by the time the butcher gets to the liver the heart of the animal has stopped beating. Therefore despite the fact that the liver – full of blood. This blood does not qualify as “living blood” worthy of dedication upon the altar by the sons of Aaron.
#2. The blood of the brit melah, similar to the rabbinic blood of the liver. Cutting the orlah of flesh on the child’s penis, does not qualify as “living blood” b/c this operation does not sever not an artery nor a vein.
#3, This case, if it occurs at all other than as a Pie in the Sky evil eye from a silly Goy, constitutes as a civil damages case. If the child dies of an STD then it qualifies as involuntary manslaughter case. In both situations Torah common law stands upon the foundation of “Eye for and Eye”. Not a bird brained literal translation like Xtians who read the Creation story as literal historical reality! Torah: Eye for and Eye the Talmud Oral Torah, interprets its intent as meaning “far monetary compensation”. The precedent from the Torah itself. The commandment that if two men struggle in a fight and one of them causes a woman to abort her child. This damages defined as a Capital Crime judged before a Sanhedrin court of 23 judges. The body of judical common law rulings, as codified within the tradition of the Mishna teaches that the guilty man, instead of being put to death, he must pay monetary compensation to the Woman. Another Torah precedent, if a man’s bull designated as a Muad bull. Meaning in the past this bull has gotten free and caused damages to others. If the owner of this bull failed to pen him up securely and the bull got out, and killed someone. The owner – liable to the death penalty. However the Torah itself commands, that if the sages impose some value of monetary compensation upon this man. That by paying this decreed amount of compensation for damages, the guilty man, saved from the death penalty.
This, basic simple learning that a child in grade school can easily answer.
#4. Your false messiah a fraud like the evil eye forgery known as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. By the apostle Paul – you are not under the law. Therefore You cannot declare the law of the Torah mitzva of Moshiach. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n. You cannot have your cake and eat it too.
All Torah both T’NaCH and Talmud — common law. In Hebrew this term – the Name for the 5th Book of the Torah משנה תורה\Mishna Torah/. Rabbi Yechuda the Head of the Great Sanhedrin court named his codification of Sanhedrin common law rulings “the Mishna” based upon this other name for the Book of דברים. But you would not know this b/c you rely upon sophomoric pathetic translations. As an undergraduate who relies upon translations you do not qualify as having a doctorate in the literature of the T’NaCH. T’NaCH and Talmud both common law legal systems. The latter a mussar common law whereas the latter an halachic common law. משנה תורה\Mishna Torah/ means common law. Hence rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna from beginning to end, a codification of Case/Rule judicial rulings. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n.
The church simpletons “literalists” presume that the Mishna together with its Gemara commentary to the Mishna cannot possibly be the revelation which Jews refer to as the Oral Torah. Such טיפש פשט/brain dead stupid\bat shit crazy/ absurd Pie in the Sky church declarations resulted in the Nazi book burnings of the Talmud in Paris in 1242! You Goyim compare to dogs, you continually turn around and eat your own vomit from generation to generation to generation. Your blood libel slanders culminated in the Shoah. The systematic torture and murder of 75% of all Western European Jewry in less than 3 years. Your god JeZeus called this wickedness — “By their fruits you shall know them”.
The prophet Shmuel/Samuel for you\ as a prophet served as the enforcer of Great Sanhedrin court room common law judicial rulings. All T’NaCH prophets served as police enforcers of the Sanhedrin common law courts. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n.
Torah common law stands upon the foundation\יסוד/ of precedents. In Hebrew as recorded in the Hebrew Siddur/Prayer book\ the common law central idea of precedent called בנין אב.
Meaning for a person to understand a later Prophetic Book, like for example the Book of Shmuel/Samuel\ that person Torah common law requires Torah positive and negative commandments learned as precedents whereby the later prophet, in this example: Shmuel anoints Shaul from the tribe of Binyamin and David from the tribe of Yechuda – as Moshiach.
Your NT fraud fails to discern the differences between T’NaCH judicial common law from Greek/Roman statute law. Hence when your apostle Paul declared that Goyim were not under the law. Paul expressed religious rhetoric propaganda! Why? Because he failed to differentiate between judicial common law from Legislative statute law. And sloppy church followers of the NT fraud, never troubled themselves to delve into these – day and night – fundamental distinctions. The two legal systems as different as oil and water! Ooooops so sloppy.
The church never searched for how the mitzva of Moshiach, a Oral Torah commandment which defines the k’vanna of the Written Torah – understood through positive & negative Torah precedent commandments!!!! Torah a common law legal system. Common law requires precedents. The precedents of the Torah and the Talmud — commandments and Halachot.
Your sloppy church likewise failed to learn crux Torah terms based equally so upon Torah precedents. How does the Torah define love? How does the Torah define Prophet? Prophets do not predict the future. Witchcraft predicts the future. The gospel idea of “fulfilling the words of the prophets” amounts to witchcraft!!! LOL
Mercy the 4th Oral Torah attribute which your Calvinist Church/Puritan denies. So again you cannot employ a key Oral Torah attribute when your church fathers deny the revelation of the Oral Torah 13 attributes which Moshe heard orally at Horev 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf.
LikeLike
Be more concise. I’m not reading your essays in response to my brief responses.
Did your God manifest as an Angel in a burning bush?
You try to explain it away because YOU DONT BELIEVE.
I won’t give my attention to the long rants of a mere unbeliever like you.
You a polytheist idolater whose gods are the profane rabbis. Repent.
And by the way, New Puritanism is another term for the old Apostolic Judaism which has rejected Oral Torah forever.
If you reply, be as brief as me.
LikeLike
Of course not. Though swearing a Torah oath the chosen Cohen people can create Angelic messengers. Yaacov did this when he sent an Angel to Esau and wrestled with Esau’s Angelic messenger. The God of Israel too did this when he sent Moshe to Egypt as his “Angel”.
The opposite of a Torah oath, profaning a Torah oath created the floods which destroyed both the generation of Noach, the 40 year wilderness generation in the days of Moshe, and the WWII Shoah of the Jewish people.
Of course I DO NOT BELIEVE! No Torah commandment to believe in any God. Hence I am an atheist praise HaShem who does not believe in the Man-made JeZeus or Allah theological Creed Gods of av tumah avoda zarah – the 2nd Sinai commandment which you despise.
Your ignorant speculations – noise. t’shuva does not mean repentance. Your sophomoric silly translations of your worthless bibles, only good to read in the toilet which has no toilet paper. The pages so incredibly thin. They do an excellent job of cleaning the butt*.
LikeLike
Atheists don’t believe in Yah. Yah doesn’t believe in letting Atheists into His eternal kingdom: “In spite of all this, they kept on sinning; despite His wonderful works, THEY DID NOT BELIEVE” (Psalm 78:32). “[T]hey despised the pleasant land; they DID NOT BELIEVE His promise” (Psalm 106:24).
You must have a NEW HEART, a mental transformation.
You are a polytheist.
Your false gods are the Hebrew Letters and the rabbis. They are false gods.
Repent of your unbelief!
The God who manifested in a bush that was dying yet lived manifested as a Jewish rabbi who was crucified and resurrected.
You must be born again.
Cast down your idols.
Turn to the Messiah.
Seek Him.
LikeLike
The Divine Name Yah affixed to the Nefesh dedicated upon Pesach. You have never kept Pesach.
LikeLike
A foreign‑policy civil war inside the American right
Neo-Con opposition to Trump 2.0 Campaigned “to stop all wars”. Meaning eternal wars – Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan wars – his primary concern. To sum up Trump 2.0 טוב מיעט ממיעט טוב – Better a little good, than allot not good. Better a reliable Israeli ally than a lot of EU back stabbers. Trump 2.0 remembers the Yom Kippur oil embargo and the recent BRICS replacement policy. His destruction of both Venezuela and Iranian oil threats defines his vision of America First.
Neo Con vs. Trump 2.0: Two very different foreign‑policy traditions now coexist — and clash — inside the American right. Neo‑conservatism emerged in the late 20th century and became especially influential after 9/11. Bush campaigned against the US maintaining a “Nation Building” Foreign Policy. VP ‘Dick’ Chaney defines the Neo Con agenda. The Democrat Clinton/Obama Administrations both promoted the Bush 1.0 ”New World Order” international alliance as the Top US strategic foreign policy.
Neo-Con notions of spreading “the Good News” & “converting” foreign nations to embrace “democracy and democratic values” negates the classic foreign policy of trading with foreign nations as the central theme of Strategic US Foreign policy. Prior to the post WWII Pax American Empire, virtually all US Administrations focused upon building Universities rather than selling military equipment to foreign nations. Candace Owens expressed support for the post-9/11 invasion of Iraq, a necessary action in response to terrorism. Hashtag rapid rate opinionism. The USS Liberty no black Americans killed; yet hashtag Owens jabbers about the USS Liberty as if an event 22 years before her birth qualifies as a MAJOR black American issue today.
LikeLike
A foreign‑policy civil war inside the American right
Neo-Con opposition to Trump 2.0 Campaigned “to stop all wars”. Meaning eternal wars – Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan wars – his primary concern. To sum up Trump 2.0 טוב מיעט ממיעט טוב – Better a little good, than allot not good. Better a reliable Israeli ally than a lot of EU back stabbers. Trump 2.0 remembers the Yom Kippur oil embargo and the recent BRICS replacement policy. His destruction of both Venezuela and Iranian oil threats defines his vision of America First.
Neo Con vs. Trump 2.0: Two very different foreign‑policy traditions now coexist — and clash — inside the American right. Neo‑conservatism emerged in the late 20th century and became especially influential after 9/11. Bush campaigned against the US maintaining a “Nation Building” Foreign Policy. VP ‘Dick’ Chaney defines the Neo Con agenda. The Democrat Clinton/Obama Administrations both promoted the Bush 1.0 ”New World Order” international alliance as the Top US strategic foreign policy.
Neo-Con notions of spreading “the Good News” & “converting” foreign nations to embrace “democracy and democratic values” negates the classic foreign policy of trading with foreign nations as the central theme of Strategic US Foreign policy. Prior to the post WWII Pax American Empire, virtually all US Administrations focused upon building Universities rather than selling military equipment to foreign nations. Candace Owens expressed support for the post-9/11 invasion of Iraq, a necessary action in response to terrorism. Hashtag rapid rate opinionism. The USS Liberty no black Americans killed; yet hashtag Owens jabbers about the USS Liberty as if an event 22 years before her birth qualifies as a MAJOR black American issue today.
LikeLike
PM Begin returned Sinai & PM Sharon returned Gaza because neither this nor that lands – Sinai nor Gaza – not included within the borders of either the First or Second Republic. Tucker Carlson Neo Con ideology rejects the leadership of Team Trump.
The Labor leader in this pic,(see home page) has no more reliable ability to capture the Premiership than the Neo Cons convince President Trump that he should embrace their eternal war, US policeman of the Planet – Neo Con tenets of faith! The clip below, therefore represents a blood libel. PM Begin returned Sinai & PM Sharon returned Gaza because neither this nor that – Sinai nor Gaza – included within the borders of either the First or Second Republic. Both Bush 1 & 2, Clinton, Obama, Hillary, Pelosi etc defined their vision of the New World Order as – promoting multilateralism, international alliances, and global cooperation. Not so Team Trump’s America First.
All nations throughout history, shape and determine their international borders – based upon Wars either won or lost. The 1846 Mexican American war definitively proves this fact. The Youtube propaganda “Israel’s borders not set in stone”, confuses the stone Sinai tablets with the international borders of the Jewish state! Post ’67 UN 242 England and France attempted to determine the international boundaries, and location of Israel’s Capital. Post ’73 Yom Kippur War both England and France criticized UN 338’s “failure” to directly mention a Palestinian state. UN 2334, Obama followed this “Leash -line”, hostile European imperialism!
Israel as a nation, our wars determine our borders. No different than that of North Ireland “illegally occupied” (a propaganda language) by Britain. Its not the place of the UN or any country who does not share a common border with Israel, to presume that they predetermine Israeli strategic diplomacy. Israel shares nothing in common with Calvinist predetermination dogmatism. Pie in the Sky “International Law” does not determine legality or illegality of wars won or lost. War, defined by risk and consequences.
LikeLike
Silly יה the name of the נפש dedicated on Pesach. LOL Pesach has no connection with Goyim any more than יה.
LikeLike
Lateral Sanhedrin Court-Room Common law\\משנה תורה. A picture of a person NOT the actual person. Oral Torah common law NOT religious statute halacha.
The 3rd sugya starts דף ג: תנן בכסף: מנ”ל and concludes on דף ד. אימא דידה הוו צריכה. The central premise introduced in this sugya Aggadic middot as taught by rabbi Yossi. Its starts with his 18th middah: כל הלמד מעניינו, דבר זה בעייתו, דבר זה נברא להוראתם. This teaching reflects the idea that every experience has something to teach us, reinforcing the value of personal growth and understanding. The 19th middah of Rabbi Yossi, “כל העוסק בתורה בשמחה, והכנה להקל על עצמו ולא להקשות על עצמו, בנין אב מכתוב אחד,” interprets the phrase: מה אמה מעשה ידיה לרבה אף בת מעשה ידיה לאביה. If the father gives his נערה daughter in marriage, (a girl between 12 to 12.5 years) the money logically belongs to him. The actions and efforts of both sons and daughters have intrinsic value and can positively impact their parents.
מנ”ל (מאי נפקא מיניה) – this phrase, a סוד kabbalah reference to the 7th Oral Torah middah רוב חסד. Wisdom commandments/time-oriented mitzvot\ stand apart from קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה commandments – the latter בניני אבות מצוות do not require k’vanna in and of themselves any more than Gemara precedent halachot; however by employing these toldot Primary and secondary sources (as codified in both the Torah and Talmud) – they can “form” a sort of wine bibber discernment understanding of the k’vanna of Oral Torah Shekinah spirits within the Yatzir Ha-Tov of the bnai brit hearts. This Torah “wisdom” completely unique to bnai brit Israel who live within the oath sworn lands – based upon the 1st Sinai commandment לשמה.
Just as Shabbat requires separating 6 days of מלאכה from 1 day forbidden to do מלאכה so too קידושין as a מלאכה wisdom commandment. האב זכאי בבתו – בקטנותה ובנערותה but not a בוגרת, a daughter 12.5 years and older. Boris Badenov and Natasha Fatale, their statute halachic יד, וכסף משנהcodes fail to learn Gemara halachot as משנה תורה precedents with the purpose to review the language of the “Home Mishna”. They erroneously presume that Gemara halachot stand upon their own two feet; just as Boris’s ספר המצוות limits Torah commandments to two basic categories. Their religious halachic codifications negate Talmudic courtroom common law as THE priority of the Framers of both Mishna and Gemara. Both “perverts” fail to grasp the k’vanna of האשה נקנית excludes תינוקות בנות.
The pollution of Rambam’s assimilated avoda zarah, impacts all generations down stream. הראב”ד failed to catch this fundamental most basic of errors. The כסף משנה totally ignored this flagrant violation of the basic fundamentals of Talmudic scholarship as well. The same ירידות הדורות-domino effect upon the all the super-commentaries. The error of permitting Jews to kiss up to the recently rediscovered Greek philosophy impacted all generations starting with Saadia Gaon. No commentary upon the Talmud written by any g’lut rabbinic school – not even the French common law school – prioritized the study of Talmudic law by first breaking each sugya down to its basic fundamental basis of middot. This mistake made by Gaonim and Reshonim scholarsip introduced a “Xtian/Muslim” substitute theology which prioritizes belief in God in the Heavens, belief in Monotheism, acceptance of Plato/Aristotle syllogism statute deductive reasoning. This av tumah violation of the 2nd Sinai commandment caused the Jews to forget the Oral Torah and blow out the lights of Hanukkah.
The Rambam most certainly not a Karaite. None the less, his assimilation to Greek schools of philosophy, specifically Aristotle’s deductive logic, this exact assimilation caused him to “replace” static deductive syllogism reasoning for פרדס fluid inductive reasoning. Religious Jews read their Talmud like Xtians and Arabs/Muslims read their Bible/Koran respectively. Neither T’NaCH nor Talmud instructs history. Av tuma avoda zara religions insist that both T’NaCH & Talmud teach history. Why? Because Goyim never accepted the Torah revelation at Sinai, starting with their imaginary Jesus son of God, and their false prophet Muhammad. Only Israel accepts the revelation of the Torah; the Torah curse Amalek/ערב רב Jews\, no different from Shomronim, Tzeddukim, Karaim, Jesus son of God believers and Muhammad the prophet of Allah – all Universally worship other Gods.
Let me bring the language of פרק שלישי הלכות אישות – א.
כיצד האשה מתקדשת. בכסף הוא מקדש אין פחות מפרוטה כסף או שוה פרוטה. אומר לה הרי אתת מקודשת לי. או הרי את מאורסת לי. או הרי את לי לאשה בזה וכו. Oral Torah middot רוח הקודש Torah Spirits no more words than T’NaCH or Talmud instruct history. Torah wisdom requires a discerning eye which requires distinguishing like from like. All Torah wisdom commandments/time-oriented mitzvot\ absolutely and most basically-fundamentally require Torah prophetic mussar. Linking rabbinic middot affixed to Torah Oral Torah Spirit middot which Moshe Rabbeinu heard at Horev – as the definitive “WAY/TRUTH” (8th Oral Torah middah) directly turns to the tohor middot within the Yatzir Ha-Tov as the basis to righteously pursue justice among our People. Righteous judicial justice which dedicates (comparable to korbanot) to make a fair restoration of damages inflicted upon our people consequent to our pursuit of tuma middot within our Yatzir Ha-Rah … herein sums up the k’vanna of Torah faith.
LikeLike
משנה תורה – קידושין: סוגיה ראשונה
Order serves as the bedrock foundation for פרדס logic analysis. This term סוגיה prioritizes subject “issues” raised by each and every sub-chapter. The Gemara analysis of the faceted language of the Mishna broken down into easily identifiable “sections”. My Rav, Aaron Nemuraskii taught me: First Order then speed. The first time we completed the Sha’s Bavli together we did it in four months. But prior to making a study of the Talmud, Rav Aaron required development of basic skills. 1) Read the Chumash in Hebrew like I could read an English newspaper. 2) Do the same with the Aramaic Targums. 3) Make an in-depth across the board study of classic Midrash. Achieving this foundation took almost 5 years of intense study.
Rav Nemuraskii did not accept a salary from the Yeshiva. The integrity of this Man reminds me of President Trump who refuses to take a salary as President of the United States. During these crucial five years we would learn, or he permitted me to study privately in my dorm room alone, due to my Dyslexia “sugya”. Surrounding outside movement, noise my kryptonite. Only this Rav and Dr. Dunning, my Russian history professor at Texas A&M ever recognized my dyslexia “sugya”. Dr. Dunning rather than insist that I sit in a class-room demanded the substitute of my doing research in the University library while sitting in a private carrel. Both men demanded excellence in scholarship. In the latter case, wrote a thesis that argued the genius of Stalin in that he enticed Hitler to invade Russia prior to the expected fall of Britain, which forced Germany to fight a two-front war. Used this thesis to explain why Stalin withdrew unto complete social isolation for about a week.
Under the leadership of the Czar, the long drawn out fight known as WWI caused that government of three centuries to collapse – burned in the flames of internal revolution which pitted Social Revolutionary anarchists against Mensheviks. The Mensheviks favored that Soviet local Parliaments regulate all bureaucracies which in their turn regulated industry and trade.
Bakunin viewed the “Establishment” State – bureaucratic machine as inherently oppressive which fundamentally required dismantlement. Marxist-Leninism by stark contrast, re-established Czarist Russia’s bureaucratic autocracy. The political assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand by a Serbian nationalist initiated WWI and lead to the establishment of Kerensky Russian Provisional Government in 1917. This first post Czarist government based itself upon the anarchist Social Revolutionary Party/Bakunin founder\ who like the Serbian nationalist group – called the Black Hand – favored assassination as a key tool to achieve political change. The Kerensky government separated from Bakunin’s political ideas over the matter of political assassinations.
The Social Revolutionary Bakunin Party did advocate for political violence and assassination as a anarchist challenge to terminate the inherently “corrupt” bureaucratic State; yet in post Revolution Russia its leaders pursued a more reformist agenda, aiming to stabilize the state rather than dismantle it through assassination. The Social Revolutionary Party, followed and accepted Bakunin’s views concerning the anarchist value of political violence as an anarchist challenge to rest power away from the State and its corrupt bureaucracies. They justified such actions as essential to destabilize oppressive bureaucratic structures, aligning with Bakunin’s broader revolutionary goals.
Bakunim opposed the rigid Marx theory which organized revolution as a fight between the Classes which pitted the bourgeoisie (capitalists) against the proletariat (working class). The latter political idea lead to the establishment of the “dictatorship of the proletariat” under Lenin. Bakunim’s Social Revolutionaries Peasants Party prioritized a society organized around communes and federations, collective ownership free from any centralized bureaucratic regulatory power. Important to remember that Czarist bureaucratic Autocracy, like the Confederate States of America, clung to an agricultural based, class rule society, rather than an industrial based society – until defeat through wars forced change in Bolshevik Russia and the crushed Southern States – the ashes of General Sherman’s Atlanta, and his march to the Sea.
What does this have to due with קידושין? Does the Talmud institute the institutions of religious law as the Rambam, Tur, and Shulkan Aruch advocate or Torah as the written Constitution of the 12 Tribe Republic, which enshrines צדק צדק תרדוף as the faith mandate for Great Sanhedrin משנה תורה-Legislative Review as its Constitutional mandate? Clearly the former idea favors the realities of oppressed g’lut Jews. Whereas the latter vision exists as a prophesy for the restoration of a Constitutional Jewish Republic within the borders of an Independent “Zionist” Jewish State.
How to define these two opposing, fundamentally different interpretations in a word? Power vs. Justice. Contrast the lawfare employed against Trump and his Maga supporters before and after he won the 2024 election! Compare this to Darth Vader who said unto Luke in the opening Star Wars movie: “You do not know the power of the Dark-Side of the Force”. The Rambam second quoted halacha made kosher child rape to accomplish קידושין in his halachic code. In Chullin Rambam’s halacha prioritizes knowledge over יראת שמים in shechita – butchery of animals for human consumption. But the Apecorus (or Epicurus), possesses the required knowledge, and yet the sages within the Gemara ruled such shechita as treif. Clearly, this person lacks יראת שמים; the awareness that protecting ones’ good name reputation understood and prioritized as the most essential requirement for any public service or commercial trade.
Its this fundamental distinction which separates Torah Constitutional governance, expressed through משנה תורה common law Sanhedrin Federal courtrooms from g’lut religious ritual halachot which separates Justice from Power – tohor from tuma. Hence have compared קידושין of the Talmud to the Bakunin vs Marxist socialist political theories as a way to high-light the sharp separation between Justice from Power; righteousness from oppression.
LikeLike
Order serves as the bedrock foundation for פרדס logic analysis. This term סוגיה prioritizes subject “issues” raised by each and every sub-chapter. The Gemara analysis of the faceted language of the Mishna broken down into easily identifiable “sections”. My Rav, Aaron Nemuraskii taught me: First Order then speed. The first time we completed the Sha’s Bavli together we did it in four months. But prior to making a study of the Talmud, Rav Aaron required development of basic skills. 1) Read the Chumash in Hebrew like I could read an English newspaper. 2) Do the same with the Aramaic Targums. 3) Make an in-depth across the board study of classic Midrash. Achieving this foundation took almost 5 years of intense study.
Rav Nemuraskii did not accept a salary from the Yeshiva. The integrity of this Man reminds me of President Trump who refuses to take a salary as President of the United States. During these crucial five years we would learn, or he permitted me to study privately in my dorm room alone, due to my Dyslexia “sugya”. Surrounding outside movement, noise my kryptonite. Only this Rav and Dr. Dunning, my Russian history professor at Texas A&M ever recognized my dyslexia “sugya”. Dr. Dunning rather than insist that I sit in a class-room demanded the substitute of my doing research in the University library while sitting in a private carrel. Both men demanded excellence in scholarship. In the latter case, wrote a thesis that argued the genius of Stalin in that he enticed Hitler to invade Russia prior to the expected fall of Britain, which forced Germany to fight a two-front war. Used this thesis to explain why Stalin withdrew unto complete social isolation for about a week.
Under the leadership of the Czar, the long drawn out fight known as WWI caused that government of three centuries to collapse – burned in the flames of internal revolution which pitted Social Revolutionary anarchists against Mensheviks. The Mensheviks favored that Soviet local Parliaments regulate all bureaucracies which in their turn regulated industry and trade.
Bakunin viewed the “Establishment” State – bureaucratic machine as inherently oppressive which fundamentally required dismantlement. Marxist-Leninism by stark contrast, re-established Czarist Russia’s bureaucratic autocracy. The political assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand by a Serbian nationalist initiated WWI and lead to the establishment of Kerensky Russian Provisional Government in 1917. This first post Czarist government based itself upon the anarchist Social Revolutionary Party/Bakunin founder\ who like the Serbian nationalist group – called the Black Hand – favored assassination as a key tool to achieve political change. The Kerensky government separated from Bakunin’s political ideas over the matter of political assassinations.
The Social Revolutionary Bakunin Party did advocate for political violence and assassination as a anarchist challenge to terminate the inherently “corrupt” bureaucratic State; yet in post Revolution Russia its leaders pursued a more reformist agenda, aiming to stabilize the state rather than dismantle it through assassination. The Social Revolutionary Party, followed and accepted Bakunin’s views concerning the anarchist value of political violence as an anarchist challenge to rest power away from the State and its corrupt bureaucracies. They justified such actions as essential to destabilize oppressive bureaucratic structures, aligning with Bakunin’s broader revolutionary goals.
Bakunim opposed the rigid Marx theory which organized revolution as a fight between the Classes which pitted the bourgeoisie (capitalists) against the proletariat (working class). The latter political idea lead to the establishment of the “dictatorship of the proletariat” under Lenin. Bakunim’s Social Revolutionaries Peasants Party prioritized a society organized around communes and federations, collective ownership free from any centralized bureaucratic regulatory power. Important to remember that Czarist bureaucratic Autocracy, like the Confederate States of America, clung to an agricultural based, class rule society, rather than an industrial based society – until defeat through wars forced change in Bolshevik Russia and the crushed Southern States – the ashes of General Sherman’s Atlanta, and his march to the Sea.
What does this have to due with קידושין? Does the Talmud institute the institutions of religious law as the Rambam, Tur, and Shulkan Aruch advocate or Torah as the written Constitution of the 12 Tribe Republic, which enshrines צדק צדק תרדוף as the faith mandate for Great Sanhedrin משנה תורה-Legislative Review as its Constitutional mandate? Clearly the former idea favors the realities of oppressed g’lut Jews. Whereas the latter vision exists as a prophesy for the restoration of a Constitutional Jewish Republic within the borders of an Independent “Zionist” Jewish State.
How to define these two opposing, fundamentally different interpretations in a word? Power vs. Justice. Contrast the lawfare employed against Trump and his Maga supporters before and after he won the 2024 election! Compare this to Darth Vader who said unto Luke in the opening Star Wars movie: “You do not know the power of the Dark-Side of the Force”. The Rambam second quoted halacha made kosher child rape to accomplish קידושין in his halachic code. In Chullin Rambam’s halacha prioritizes knowledge over יראת שמים in shechita – butchery of animals for human consumption. But the Apecorus (or Epicurus), possesses the required knowledge, and yet the sages within the Gemara ruled such shechita as treif. Clearly, this person lacks יראת שמים; the awareness that protecting ones’ good name reputation understood and prioritized as the most essential requirement for any public service or commercial trade.
Its this fundamental distinction which separates Torah Constitutional governance, expressed through משנה תורה common law Sanhedrin Federal courtrooms from g’lut religious ritual halachot which separates Justice from Power – tohor from tuma. Hence have compared קידושין of the Talmud to the Bakunin vs Marxist socialist political theories as a way to high-light the sharp separation between Justice from Power; righteousness from oppression.
Have openly despised the Rambam halachic codification as a perversion of Judicial common law courtrooms within the borders of the oath sworn lands vs. static ritual halachot for g’lut Jewry to be religious and therein believe in God. The Torah has no such commandment to believe in God.
Mishna Chagigah 2:1:
משנה חגיגה ב:א. אין דורשין במרכבה בשלושה דברים: באדם, ובעלמא, ובשמות. וכל העוסק בַּמרכבה, אין לו חלק לעולם הבא.
The soul of Man; the interpretation of the Isaiah’s vision concerning the Divine Chariot; and Divine Names. This warning provokes a strong Yatzir for good and evil within the Heart. Impossible to learn Isaiah and Yehezkel’s vision simply by reading the words of these prophets by themselves alone.
This Mishna warns against the NT avoda zara error of attempting to learn “Big Picture” ideas which the prophets spoke without cementing these later prophetic mussar to Torah commandments. The NT av tuma avoda zara did this error with Moshiach. It failed to learn the mitzva of Moshiach to the precedent of Moshe standing before the court of Par’o touching the matter of straw withheld, while the slave overlords beat Israelites for our failure to meet our brick production quotas.
Moshe anointed the House of Aaron as Moshiach, not to make absolutely silly and utterly worthless ritual barbeques unto heaven-sacrifices. Rather to dedicate oath brit dedication of tohor middot\מלכות/ which directly impact Israelite social behavior thereafter. The mitzva of Moshiach from the Torah, rests upon the burden to rule the oath sworn conquered lands with judicial justice which makes fair compensation of damages inflicted.
The vision of the Merkabah, a vision of the mitzva of Moshiach. באדם learns from the Menorah in the Mishkan vision description. The brit cut between the pieces wherein childless Avram cut his soul through an oath alliance; the dedication of Cohen seed life in the world to come. What defines the soul of Man? The creation of the world to come future born soul Cohen seed. Herein expressly defines the k’vanna of the mitzva of קידושין. The 7 Menorah branches refers to the 7 Yom Tov “soul of the Cohen seed of the Avot”: Pesach-Shevuot; Rosh HaShana-Yom Kippur; Sukkot-Sh’meni Atzaret and Shabbat. These 7 Holy periods, they affix Divine Names for the Cohen “soul” dedicated on those holy days; Pesach: Nefesh (Divine Name) Ya; Shevuot: Ruach (Divine Name) Ha’El; Rosh HaShana: Neshama (Divine Name) El; Yom Kippur: Chiyya (Divine Name) Elohim; Sukkot: Yechida (Divine Name) El Shaddai; Shemeni Atzaret: Nefesh Kalli (Divine Name) Eish HaElohim; and Shabbat הבדלה (Divine Name) Shalom.
בעלמא do not contemplate concerning the creation of the physical world, like as does treif Xtian fundamentalist avoda zara. The dedication of the Book of בראשית introduces the subject of “Av” time-oriented Torah commandments! בשמות the abstract naming of עולם הבא as yet unborn Cohen Children souls through Divine Names in compliance with the oath sworn alliance cut upon the “soul” of Avram at the brit between the pieces. The cutting of the animals into their opposing halves at that Av-brit, teaches the prophetic mussar, just expressed, by means of משל\נמשל.
This סודי kabbalah concealed during g’lut oppression. The Mishna, codified in 210 CE, broke the tradition of not writing down the Oral Torah Great Sanhedrin courts legal rulings. The Mishna Chagigah 2:1 warns not to make reactionary, shallow, one source interpretations – like the Goyim do with their NT shallow theology driven interpretation to place the mitzva of Moshiach into a clean box. The Mishna, a common law legal system which fundamentally requires making a דרוש-פשט search of how the language of the prophets serves as a precedent wherein they interpret the k’vanna of Torah positive and negative commandments elevated to tohor time oriented commandments. Failure to heed this dire warning defines both the NT and Rambam Yad av tuma avoda zara heresies.
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
הלהות גדולות הלכות קידושין
אסיר ליה גבר ישראל למנסב איתתא
This opening line prohibits sexual acts as a means to acquire a woman as a wife without the time oriented k’vanna of the mitzva of קידושין. This fundamental distinction separate the kosher B’HaG common law halachic code from the treif av tuma Rambam statute law halachic code which perverts the oath brit cut between the pieces touching the life and birth of the chosen Cohen people throughout all generations in time to a profaned religious ritual observance that Jews in g’lut can easily do and keep.
Making ritual observance of Torah commandments and rabbinic halakot defines the justification by by רשעים to pervert the Talmud away from the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva, Yishmael, HaGalili – their understanding of פרדס as a unique inductive reason logic system which systematically compares Case/Rule to similar Case\Rule precedents. The burden of modern Zionism, now that we have achieved national Independence, to restore the Torah as the written Constitution of our Republic and the Sanhedrin Federal Court system, which has the mandate of Legislative Review of all law passed by the Knesset, as the basis of Jewish justice — as opposed to political power — within the borders of the oath sworn lands.
Common law courtrooms no more resemble ritual halachic religious observances than Brit compares to covenant. Only a shallow reactionary ignorance declares that the meaning of brit the same meaning as the alien puke covenant. Absolutely no Torah mitzva for Jews to live in accursed g’lut. The Wilderness generation serves as witness to this cold hard fact. Raising a handkerchief as a symbol for “acquisition” and intent for the time oriented mitzva of קידושין, compares to marriage after visiting a whore-house.
בה”ג: עד דמקדש לה בכספא או בתבובתא או בביאה, וכולהי בסהדי\וכולי בעדי. בכסף מדאוריתא מנלן. דכתיב (דברים כד,א) כי יקח איש אשה וכתיב התם (בראשית כג:יג) נתתי כסף השדה קח ממני. מה קיחה דהתם בכספא אף קיחה דהכא בכספא. ותנן האשה נקנית בשלשה דרכים, וקונה את עצמה בשני דרכים במיתת הבעל ובגט. נקנת בכסף בשטר ובביאה, בכסף, ב”ש אומרים בדינר ובשוה דינר. בה”א בפרוטה ובשוה פרוטה, הילכתא כבית הילל. וכמה היא פרוטה וכו.
Contrast Karo’s כסף משנה super-commentary on the Rambam who declared money as merely a rabbinic mitzva! Karo’s statute law clear as the sun in the sky on a cloudless day, did not understand the priority which T’NaCH and Talmudic common law bases all Torah learning upon precedents! G’lut religious statute law, based simply upon the Karo commentary upon the Rambam could not care a less about precedents. Hence the Beit Yosef collage of Reshonim opinions on any given halacha does not base itself upon the T’NaCH/Talmudic יסוד which absolutely requires all Torah learning expressed through the discipline of bringing פרדס inductive reasoning which compares Case/Din to similar Case\Din courtroom rulings. Karo’s Shulkan Aruch focused solely upon g’lut religious ritual observances; his code failed to express or reveal any Torah wisdom which teaches Av Torah time oriented commandments, as the Talmudic framers explicitly intended.
Never as any of the sick book licker rabid rabbis ever criticize Karo’s contradiction against a Gaon scholar! Their inept ירידות הדורות box thinking which openly declares that later generations cannot dispute with earlier generation as vacuous as air inside a balloon. Off the דרך Orthodox Judaism statute law rabbis, they have no shame.
Bakunin’s revolt against bureaucratic autocracy resembles the Talmudic revolt against the frozen halakhic codification of Rambam and Karo. Where Marx restored a new form of centralized coercion, Rambam’s Yad replaced deliberative common law with legislative absolutism. Both substitute administration for judicious common law lateral Sanhedrin Federal courtroom justice. קידושין simply not some sterile religious ritual that thrives in g’lut. But rather this mesechta of the Talmud teaches a strong mussar rebuke to the generations. Don’t get to comfortable in g’lut. Don’t duplicate the false oath sworn by the pre-Shoah generations of European Orthodox Judaism. Acceptance of the Sinai revelation predicates upon seeking the restoration of a public constitutional Republic, comparable to a man who seeks a wife.
The perpetuation of the oath time oriented brit Cohen-seed from generation to generation defines the destiny of the children of Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov. Ritual religious halachic observance in g’lut as useful as sucking tits from a boar hog. The Torah, taught through the משל of the mitzva of קידושין instructs the דיוק נמשל that Geulah from g’lut Egyptian legal oppression depends not upon observance of empty religious ritual observances, g’lut Jews cursed by the Torah curse that they have lost the wisdom how to obey the Torah לשמה. Rather Geulah depends upon the strengch of our cries, like we made in Egypt, which express our yearning to rule our homeland with judicial common law just courtrooms. The difference between Rambam’s halakhic code and the Talmud’s constitutional jurisprudence, the difference between Power and Justice — between exile and sovereignty.
Now that the Jewish people have restored sovereignty, our task is not ritual observance but judicial redemption — to rebuild the Torah as written Constitution and restore Sanhedrin legislative review as the Republic’s foundation. Only then will צדק replace כח — justice replace power — and קידושין fulfill its purpose as oath-brit of national rebirth of the chosen Cohen people.
LikeLike
Why does the blessing of Shabbat repeatedly refer to “מלאכתך” both in the evening & morning קידוש blessing which distinguishes between shabbat from chol?
מלאכתך closer to the word מלאך rather than עבודה which refers to “work” מלאכתך. Therefore the idea of the mitzva of shabbat to cease to create life rather than “work”. Granted that a man needs to work, from the sweat of his brow in order to live, as the Torah refers to Adam after HaShem expelled Adam from the Garden of Eden. Therefore the mitzva of shabbat, a person does this ‘time oriented mitzva’ (which requires k’vanna) Jews who keep shabbat, they develop the conscious k’vanna not to create מלאכים\life, like as did Yaacov who sent a מלאך to his brother Esau who came to meet him surrounded with an Army lead by 400 Officers, according to Targum Uziel, in order to kill Yaacov and his entire family.
The Torah states that Esau greeted Yaacov with a kiss. But Rashi teaches that he wanted to bite his brother’s neck. Akin to Bil’aam who intended to curse Israel but HaShem sent a מלאך and Bil’aam blessed Israel to the horror of the king of Moav. Swearing a Torah oath requires שם ומלכות dedications of the שם השם blown from the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart, as opposed to blow air from the lungs when pronouncing words framed from the lips, tongue, and teeth. The mitzva of shabbat absolutely requires that bnai brit Israel make this fundamental discernment which separates k’vanna from empty rote ritualism. The spiritual concept that Torah oaths can create life as in מלאכים tohor spirits achieved through the dedication of מלכות, a term that makes a רמז to מלאכה. Specifically a person can dedicate tohor Spirits revealed first to Moshe at Horev following the sin of the Golden Calf: ‘אל רחום וחנון וכו. Hence the time oriented mitzva of Shabbat reveals the holy dedication of פרדס thirteen Oral Torah middot.
Therefore, the substance crux of shabbat observance distinguishes between cessation of the creation of life rather than the false focus of not doing work. HaShem informed g’lut Adam that he must work to live. Prioritizing shabbat as not doing work misses the point of Shabbat observance which separates the holiness of LIFE over the g’lut need for working in order to live. A key but subtle distinction that avoda zara religion totally miss all together. Life prioritized over g’lut “work”, defines the k’vanna of shabbat observance throughout the generations.
LikeLike
The Journalism of Mad-Cow Maddow
Maddow’s legacy stands not as a triumph of inquiry but as a cautionary precedent: how media institutions, once guardians of accountability, can mutate into instruments of false prophet belief systems.
Rise (2016–2018): coverage drives ratings and expectations. During the height of the Russia-Gate narrative, Rachel Maddow’s MSNBC platform became the secular pulpit of the anti-Trump resistance. Her show transformed investigative speculation into moral ritual, with viewers tuning in not for evidence but for confirmation. Her detailed monologues and confident prophetic tone projected inevitability: that proof of Trump-Russia collusion was near at hand. Ratings soared; expectation became belief.
Fall (2019): Mueller Report’s anticlimax and erosion of trust. The release of the Mueller Report, which found no prosecutable collusion, exposed the gulf between Maddow’s narrative and the evidentiary record. Her defense of unelected intelligence officials—many later discredited or internally rebuked—compromised her claim to journalistic independence. When Mueller testified before Congress, that anticlimax destroyed her credibility covenant with her audience; it exposed her as being a witch rather than a prophet. Investigative journalism corrupted into partisan sermonizing: a loss of prophetic Good-Name legitimacy.
Aftermath (2020–present): rebranded as general political commentator. In the years following, Maddow repositioned herself as a scaled-down general political commentator, widening subject matter but retaining the same partisan lens, limited to the field of Russian hostility to America. Her overt support for Democratic candidates—Hillary Clinton in 2016, Joe Biden in 2020—cemented her within the ideological establishment she once claimed to honestly interrogate. Her reactionary alignment blurred journalism with advocacy and reduced MSNBC’s role to that of an echo chamber reinforcing moral ‘burn the witch’ – certainty rather than testing factual claims. Her “journalistic” style closely resembles the racism expressed through Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Scarlet Letter” which attempted to turn Donald Trump into Hester Prynne.
Her reporting style, “narrative-first” rather than “evidence-first,” parallels classic yellow journalism—sensational framing driven by political passion. The BBC’s later manipulation of Trump’s January 6th remarks exemplifies the same moral decay: editorial splicing presented partisan drama in place of judicial record. Rachel Maddow’s transformation from investigator to partisan commentator marks a structural decline in American journalism itself. In the covenantal sense, she violated the brit emunah between reporter and public—truth exchanged for loyalty to faction. The newsroom, once a tribunal of evidence, became a pulpit of ideology.
Her defense of unelected intelligence officials who later faced credibility crises has permanently compromised her claim to journalistic independence. MSNBC functions as a secular pulpit, and Maddow’s audience compares to congregants seeking moral confirmation rather than factual inquiry. Her journalist reputation collapsed after the Mueller testimony before Congress, as exposure of her false-prophet witchcraft legitimacy. Maddow’s “narrative-first” reporting slavishly obeys yellow journalism; comparable to the recent BBC slander against Trump on Jan 6th 2020 Nancy Pelosi scandal, where the BBC spliced two different Trump speeches which corrupted Trumps viewpoint to what later became known as the Jan 6th Democrat slander made against Trump. Where the BBC publicly declared Trump’s guilt for his an attempted coup. A Joseph Goebbels-like propaganda lead by Nancy Pelosi, and other disgraced politicians and key Federal bureaucrats.
The Russia-Gate scandal, its scandalous allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian interference in the 2016 election, significantly affected various media figures, including Rachel Maddow. It duplicated the Biden laptop denial made by 51 FBI Officials in the 2020 election cycle. During the peak of the Russia-Gate investigation, Maddow’s show on MSNBC gained immense viewership, becoming one of the most-watched programs in cable news. Her extensive coverage set high expectations among viewers for groundbreaking revelations related to the investigation.
Some critics argue that Maddow repeatedly presented speculative narratives as definitive conclusions; leading to claims of overstating evidence against Trump. Right-wing commentators and supporters of Trump have continuously criticized Maddow, accusing her of pushing a partisan agenda and failing to deliver on the explosive claims she sometimes hinted at; no different than from California Congress persons: Adam Schiff, Nadler, and Waters. While many viewers praised her detailed investigative approach, others felt betrayed when some aspects of the investigation, particularly regarding collusion, did not lead to the anticipated criminal charges against Trump or his associates. The Biden lawfare attempts to arrest Trump extended to his supporters like the former Mayor of New York, prior to the 2024 elections. This disgrace in American politics compares to the Charlie Kirk political assassination and to the two attempted assassinations of Donald Trump prior to the election.
Skeptics question Maddow’s credibility, especially as the Mueller Report concluded without definitive evidence of collusion; Maddow had promised the expectation that it would result in a forced Trump Nixon-like resignation from Office. Post-Russia-Gate, her show has dramatically reduced her public face; but has expanded to cover broader topics, positioning her as a damaged goods, yet resilient commentator, in the landscape of political partisan journalism.
Rachel Maddow’s rabid support for Democratic candidates, particularly Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election and Joe Biden in 2020, has directly impacted her reputation across the board. Maddow’s vocal support for Clinton and Biden led many to concluder her as nothing other than a partisan commentator – witch. Critics argue that her support reinforces echo chamber effects, where viewers continuously restricts repeated propaganda story lines, which the Liberal Media then continuously harps upon like a scratched repeating scratched phonograph record that resemble the talking points made by parrots.
Support for candidates like Clinton and Biden has fueled criticism from conservative commentators, who claim she lacks objectivity and promotes liberal Democratic & homosexual agendas. Maddow’s complete lack of neutrality, impacts her broader audience base. Even her supporters argue that she focuses too heavily on partisanship rather than objective analysis. This critique places her together with discredited Late Night Comedy Show and the View programs.
Her vocal support for the corrupt bureaucratic heads of the FBI, CIA, and NSA intelligence has permanently tar & feathered her homosexual reputation. She promotes a Democratic super-liberated agenda, rather than providing unbiased reporting. Her strong alignment with Democratic candidates detracts from the journalistic integrity. Maddow’s witchcraft compares to that of discredited programs like late-night comedy and The View. These platforms share a tendency to blur the lines between journalism and entertainment.
The LGBTQ+ under Biden’s Administration directly corrupted the Armed Forces. The slander made against right wing opposition very much resembles to how witches cursed their victims. The Liberal MSM produced propaganda no different than that produced by Nazi Germany; clearly with another intent but propaganda sought to destroy the enemy none the less.
Rachel Maddow’s MSNBC program became the flagship voice of the anti-Trump movement. Her nightly monologues framed investigation as moral drama; audiences came to expect definitive proof of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Her reliance on anonymous intelligence sources and on agencies later criticized for internal bias now defines her reputation as a journalist.
During the Biden administration, federal institutions—including the armed forces—increasingly influenced by social and ideological agendas. Policies intended to promote diversity and inclusion shifted focus from a priority for military readiness and merit, towards an He/She\It sexual confusion which directly impacted both privacy in bathrooms to men engaging in women’s sports. The resulting internal tension raised harsh questions about command discipline which the military requires, and the dignity of the sexes not invaded by the other in locker-rooms.
This moral corruption described above has a a parallel transformation in major media networks. Outlets that once emphasized investigative independence now often frame political conflict as moral drama, presenting ideological narratives as settled truth. Rachel Maddow’s MSNBC program exemplified this pattern: her use of anonymous intelligence sources and dependence on agencies later criticized for bias left her work vulnerable to charges of partisanship. The larger concern is that the American press, like state institutions, risks becoming a vehicle for political validation rather than civic accountability.
LikeLike
משנה תורה — קידושין סוגיה א
Sugya integrity represents the נפש יסודי מלאכתך wherein bnai brit Jews dedicate positive mitzvot and halachot unto קום ועשה – זימן גרמא מצוות דאורייתא המלאכים החיים — תמיד מעשה בראשית — בצלום אלהים זימן גרמא מלאכים נברא. A radical Torah spirituality that no pervert statute halachic code ever even once communicated. Comparable to the cold hard fact that the Goyim bible and koran av tuma avoda zarah never once bring the שם השם לשמה. Hence these course “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism” counterfeit fraud religions view Angels as some God sent messenger rather than a bnei brit messenger through which Israel dominates our World; av tuma avoda zarah alway oblivious to tohor vs. tuma middot spirits. The former quickens the Yatzir Ha’Tov whereas the latter breaths death into the Yatzir Ha’Raw within the heart.
The creation of מלאכים through Torah sworn oath time oriented Av commandments, the genius how to control and dominate the Created World. Healing disease in medicine, technological advancements in science etc., all the result of tohor oath sworn time oriented Av commandments which create מלאכים יש מאין, like the chosen Cohen people תמיד מעשה בראשית נברא יש מאין.
The av tuma haters of Israel, easily discernable: they seek power over justice; view Jews as a Race rather than the spiritual consequences of oath sworn time oriented Av commandments; T’NaCH as history rather than spirituality which instructs equally applicable to all generations – prophetic mussar. These av tuma religious frauds view reality based upon a static rather than interpreted through dynamic ever-changing subtle always changing perspectives.
The genius of Talmudic sugya integrity, it permits a down stream scholar who respects sugya integrity to made logical deductions, something akin to a thesis statement term paper English 101: Thesis Statement ~~ specific details which nail down the general clause made by the Thesis Statement ~~ Re-stated Thesis Statement shaped and influenced by the 3 or more specific details contained within the body of the paragraph. The Order of this type of writing discipline resembles sonnets of poetry literature.
Sonnets often explore universal themes, such as “love”, “nature”, “time”, or “morality”. William Shakespeare known to have written 154 sonnets. John Milton’s sonnets, quite often weighed political or spiritual themes. A Gemara sugya, this author suggests compares to a sonnet that has 14 lines of poetry. Obviously sugya integrity – not a sonnet.
Walt Whitman’s “Leaves of Grass” and a 14-line sonnet exemplify the rich diversity of poetry, but they differ significantly in form, structure, and thematic focus. The latter type of poetry explores ‘free verse’ that has no specific line length or meter. It resembles a collage of poems. Whitman celebrates himself, together with his expansive view of democracy and nature which reflect the vivid nature of late 19th Century American life-styles. Radically different from the Utilitarian writings of Jeremy Bentham or John Stuart Mill.
Eras radically changed the style of literature expressed. Late 18th – mid-19th Century Romanticism to 1830s – 1860s Transcendentalism to mid-19th Century Realism to late 19th Century Naturalism etc. This same trend separates the Yerushalmi Talmud from the Bavli Talmud like day different from night. None the less, the fact that the sugya of Gemara fixed, it becomes ideal to study this common law Jewish literature by means of making deductive syllogism specific comparison with the opening vs. closing communications of a sugya.
This establishes a “sh’itta” or line of reasoning, akin to the opening and closing statement made by a thesis statement paragraph. The body of any Gemara sugya raises points or issues which by logical deductive syllogism reason must fall somewhere along the line which connects the opening thesis statement with the closing re-statement of the same thesis statement proven as valid based upon the evidence of the details contained within the body of the paragraph.
Talmudic study follows this כלל: First Order then Speed. The common law specifics within a Gemara sugya follow the middot established by both rabbis Yishmael and Yossi HaGalili two sets of logical middot which permit the down stream generations the skills required to compare Case/Din to similar Case/Din different halacha rulings. Interpreting poetry in like fashion requires scholars to compare poetry with other poetry. This comparison permits scholars to separate and order literature into separate writing styles as mentioned above.
G’lut Yeshiva institutions of learning slavishly learn only the simple פשט of Jewish classic literature. No effort does g’lut religious rabbis, strive to discern between authors who wrote common law halachic commentaries from authors who wrote statute law halachic commentaries. Despite the simple fact that judicial common law courtroom authority establishes the Law of the country of Israel; having the Constitutional Torah mandate of ‘Legislative Review’ over Knesset Parliamentary statue laws. Day and night, shabbat from chol — judicial common law different from statute law religious ritual observances. Worlds separate Judicial common law which strives to rule the homeland through just restitution of damages inflicted, from observing Torah and halachot – טיפש פשט simply as religious ritual observances; an enslaved g’lut enchained mentality – Torah curse. Its easier to leave the slavery of Egypt than to free oneself from the crushed Human self-esteem dignity of living as enslaved oppressed servants – for millennia.
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
כן דרכה היא מסתירה מעשיה, ואומרת כי לא פעלה און.”
.אבן עזרא על משלי ל:כ–.כן דרך אשה מנאפת – היא דוגמת דרך הנחש על הצור, שאין אדם יודע דרכו This reactionary interpretation of משלי מוסר perhaps reflects the groveling self esteem of an oppressed slave, despite his wearing the crown of a king. King Shlomo worshipped avoda zara consequent to all his many foreign wives – a direct Torah לא תעשה. Hence it appears that this p’suk, more applicable to Shlomo than to women in general. מה אמרה תורה (דברים כב) כי יקח איש אשה. ולא כתב כי תקח אשה לאיש. מפני שדרכו של איש לחזר על אשה, ואין דרכה של אשה לחזר על איש. משל לאדם שאבדה לו אבידה. מי חוזר על מי? בעל אבידה מחזר על אבידתו
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
Men and women equally have the Torah obligation to remember the oaths sworn by the Avot through which time oriented Torah commandments create the chosen Cohen people in all generations. Yom Kippur HaShem defined the mitzva of t’shuva after Moshe reminded to remember the oaths sworn to the Avot wherein the Torah cuts an eternal brit faith alliance.
Granted our Gemara addresses the specific subject of קידושין, but utterly essential to remember that these specified mitzvot exist within the כלל of oath brit Av time oriented commandments. The פרט serves to define the כלל like as do specifics raised in the body of a thesis statement paragraph serve as concrete examples which contain and give actual meaning to the intent of the thesis statement made at the opening and closing of the paragraph.
A person has to always keep his eye upon the prize. Time oriented Torah commandments expressed through the specifics of positive and negative תולדות secondary commandments. In like manner the Gemara contains and employs all manner of halachot. But these halachot serve as precedents whereby the down stream generations can re-interpret\משנה תורה/ the original language of the Mishna viewed from a different perspective.
The tuma Yatzir within our hearts continuously seeks to worship the stars as Gods in their own existence! Hence the statute law codes made halachot from the Gemara into religious ritual observances in their own right. Later the commentaries written by the Reshonim placed upon a pedestal and worshipped. The rabbis preach the טיפש פשט parrot brained nonsense of ירידות הדורות but so conveniently ignore when the כסף משנה repudiates the הלכות גדולות.
LikeLike
קידושין
Continuing where our learning left off: It cannot be over emphasized that the Name of the Game in the study of both T’NaCH and Talmudic literature absolutely requires the generations to develop the skills required to “shoot a bearing azimuth”. Torah common law stands upon the foundation of precedents; this applies equally – straight across the board – to both Halachic and Aggadic warp/weft opposing threads contained within the language of both the T’NaCH and Talmudic Primary Sources.
Scholarship 101: The skill that discerns between Primary Sources from secondary and how much more so tertiary sources. The train of traditional Yiddishkeit Judaism has become derailed from this most essential track. This false narishkeit has placed the Era of the Reshonim upon a pedestal and generations of טיפש פשט Jewish imbeciles taught by their silly rabbis to rely upon Reshonim commentaries written almost 1000 years after the sealing of the Gemara by Rav Ashi and Ravina.
Personally, tend to condemn the Rambam perversion of Talmudic common law to Roman statute law as the fruits of Spanish Jewry’s abomination avoda zara which worshipped the rediscovered writings of the Ancient Greeks as the first cause of Jewry behaving like dogs who return and eat their own vomit.
My contempt over the failure of the Post Rambam Civil War rabbis to correct the perversion of Talmudic judicial common law unto Roman Legislature statute law; coupled with the substitute theology which replaced syllogism deductive logic and cast the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s and rabbi Yishmael’s logic upon the dung heaps of history. Yeshiva students today do not even know that בנין אב directly inferred from משנה תורה common law. Rabbinic Judaism has no shame. Currently its erev shabbat prior to Yom Kippur. What an utter disgrace of rabbinic, sin of the Golden Calf – avoda zarah.
וניתני האיש קונה, ומקנה משום דאיכא מיתת הבעל. דלאו איהו קא מקני [אלא] מן שמיא. ניתני האיש קונה, ומקנה משום דאיכא מיתת הבעל. דלאו איהו קא מקני [אלא] מן שמיא שלא מדעתה לא. (גף. ב:) קידושין
Shooting a bearing azimuth entails comparing a “home Gemara” to other similar precedent Gemara’s defines the wisdom how to study and learn the Talmud. The chief רשע, the Rambam halachic code of statute law on the surface seems similar to the common law codes made by the B’HaG, Rif and later Rosh. But wisdom requires “understanding” which discerns between like from like. And in point of fact, the Rambam halachic perversion shares no common ground with the common law halachic codes written by צדיקים ומקובלים.
Yes, the RambaN harshly criticized the Baal HaMaor over his common law criticism of the Rif code, which defines his מלחמת השם. Never encountered a Yeshiva rabbi who ever focused upon the Baal HaMaor, any more than did Yeshiva rabbis ever address the chief criticism made upon the Rashi commentary by his grandchildren – Talmud impossible to understand without out developing the skills required to jump off the dof in search of similar precedent cases in both the Bavli and Yerushalmi.
Now and again the Reshonim scholars might perchance mention a Yerushalmi source, even more rare a Gaonic Midrashic source! Yeshiva dogma, where I happened to learn, poo pooed the Yerushalmi as a minor tractate unnecessary to study. At least until I met Rav Aaron Nemuraskii who made me focus upon making a systematic study of Midrash Primary Sources.
This emphasis upon Aggadic material opened my eyes to the sins of rabbinic Judaism. Many times while in Yeshiva rabbis teaching a shiur in Talmud would skip over Aggadic sources! The commentaries written on these Aggadic Primary sources – utterly pathetic and moronic. Living trees chopped down to produce the paper for this rabbinic trash. Bottom line: post the Rambam Civil War which blew out the lights of Chanukkah and embraced the syllogism deductive logic developed by the Ancient Greeks which the Tzeddukim so much appreciated; rabbinic Judaism turned its back on the kabbalah of פרדס inductive reasoning. Jews refused to reason together with our Sinai God. Our people thereafter descended into the 7 levels of Av tuma avoda zarah which culminated in the Shoah.
As ר”ה calls to remember the sin of the Golden Calf substitute theology which replaces the שם השם לשמה with substitute words like אלהים, Jesus or Allah etc. Which perverts the Torah Written Constitution and Talmudic judicial common law model for courtroom imposed judicial rulings of law – the basis of the justice “Faith” within the Israel Republic – to the puke ‘Word of God’ Xtian idolatry. The latter abomination foists the deception of “superior” word of God, “inferior” word of Man binary av tuma 2-base avoda zarah.
The principle (that certain acquisitions bypass the husband because they are given from Heaven) is discussed in the sugyot of Ketubot (in the area of נכסי מלוג). Many of the Rishonim, in their commentaries on Ketubot, quote the phrase “מן שמיא הוא דמקני לה” the Reshonim employed to re-inforce or interpret the Gemara’s logic about acquisitions that bypass the husband’s rights.
Ketubot, the Gemara treats cases of acquisitions to the wife, bypassing husband. Rishonim quote the phrase to bolster and clarify the Gemara’s logic in נכסי מלוג discussions. The latter refers to a category of property in Jewish law, particularly in the context of marriage and family law. This catagory of property qualifies as assets that a woman brings into the marriage, which remain her property even after her husband gives the get divorce to her.
The dissolution of status of kiddushin mesechta יבמות directly addresses the k’vanna of קידושין to have children and educate these children to understand the culture and customs which set apart the chosen Cohen people from the non bnai brit Goyim of all other peoples. יבמות fundamentally requires acquisition through ביאה. That Gemara views the time-oriented commandment of קידושין viewed through the perspective of a deceased brother’s brother acquiring his wife through the act of ביאה.Oral Torah makes a דיוק\logical inference concerning the k’vanna of the time-oriented commandment of קידושין: לשם ילדים וחינוך, as the direct k’vanna of this mitzva דאורייתא. Reshonim who learn קידושין as merely a rabbinic commandment, do not grasp mesechta קידושין nor יבמות. Herein defines the curse of ירידות הדורות; the Torah curse domino effect/impact on later downstream generations.
The phrase “מן שמיא קנסוה, מן שמיא רמיוהא” aligns with the broader concept in rabbinic Judaism that emphasizes divine intervention and the belief that HaShem acts as the יסוד, the ultimate source, of creation and the authority of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev.דתנן: שומרת יבם שנפלו לה נכסים – בית שמאי אומרים: יחלקו, ובית הלל אומרים: יחלוקו נכסים שנפלו לה עד שלא תיפול לפני יבם – מודים כולם שמה שקנתה קנתה, ומה שעתידהליפול – יחלוקו גמ.לט – אמר רב הונא: ביאה פסלה מן הכהונה, מאמר לא פסל מן הכהונה.אמר רב נחמן: אף מאמר נמי פסל מן הכהונה.אמר רבא: מאי טעמא דרב הונא?אמר קרא: “לא תהיה אשת המת החוצה לאיש זר” – הויה פסלה, מאמר לא פסלה.אמר רב נחמן: מאי טעמא דרב נחמן?אמר קרא: “יבמה יבא עליה ולקחה לו לאשה” – כל דהו הויה.אמר רבא: מאי טעמא דרב הונא? אי בעית קרא, אי בעית סברא.אי בעית קרא – “יבמה יבא עליה ולקחה לו לאשה” – לקיחה גמורה אמר רחמנא.אי בעית סברא – מן שמיא הוא דרמיא עליה.
(דברים כה: ה – י) serves to preserve the deceased brother’s lineage. The Torah commands Yibbum, but also imposes restrictions on Cohanim. The commandment of Yibbum is a mitzvah that applies to all men, but the restrictions on Cohanim, based on their unique status and the sanctity required of the k’vanna of time oriented commandments. While Yibbum – a תולדות commandment, the sanctity of the Cohen’s role takes precedence. The Talmud explicitly restricts the mitzva of yibbum due to persons involved lacking the prophetic mussar wisdom to grasp the k’vanna required to elevate a positive commandment unto a Av tohor time oriented commandment. Due to this “lack of wisdom” the sages of the Talmud favored that the brother of a Cohen should do chalitzah rather than Yibbum.
Hence this Gemara addresses האשה נקנית בשלש דרכים to prioritize the essential importance of Av tohor time oriented commandments as opposed to secondary תולדות קום ועשה מצוות שלא צריך כוונה. If a man marries a woman without the k’vanna of raising children and educating these children in the culture and customs which defines the society of the Chosen Cohen people, then any mitzva from the Torah which lacks the required k’vanna reverts back to תולדות קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות. Herein these two mesechtot of Gemara re-interpret the perspective of the language of our Mishna of קידושין.
LikeLike
If you call Yeshua JeZeus, is YHVH (or JehOVah) JoVe?
LikeLike
Just as ZeZeus is bull shit so too and how much more so the translation YHVH. Impossible to translate the revelation of the 1st Sinai commandment Name. Why? Nothing in the Heavens Earth or Seas comparable to this Name revelation how much more so worthless word translations.
LikeLike
A clear example how the Rambam Yad avoda zara worshipped Islam’s false notion of some Universal ONE God Monotheism nonsense.
The 10 plagues judged the Gods of Egypt. Elijah confronted the priests who worshipped Baal! The notion that the Torah commands monotheism confuses Islam with Torah. Flat out just that simple. The Talmud states that the Goyim rejected the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Goyim do not worship their own Gods? Of course Goyim worship their own Gods. Since Goyim do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, therefore Goyim by definition worship other Gods.
Many societies have their own deities and religious systems, which can be seen as a form of polytheism. Hinduism clearly proves that Islamic monotheism – false. The seven mitzvot bnai Noach refers to gere toshav temporary residents living within the borders of Judea. It does not teach the absurd notion of some Universal God. Islam teaches this avoda zarah.
For a ger toshav to violate one of the 7 mitzvot – this qualifies as a Capital Crime/death penalty offence. Only a Sanhedrin court could judicate a Capital Crime/death penalty case. The jurisdiction of all Sanhedrin courts, only within the borders of Judea. Hence the absurd notion that the 7 mitzvot Bnai Noach applies Universally to all Goyim, simply pie in the sky bat shit crazy. The Torah in the Book of D’varim defines two types of Goyim; the ger toshav in mesechta Sanhedrin and the Nacree/Canaani in Baba Kama. Concerning treif meat the Book of D’varim writes: permitted to give the treif meat to the ger toshav or sell the treif meat to the Canaani. The Talmud defines the Chumash. It does not rule independent from the Written Torah Constitutional Mandate. Mesechta Sanhedrin whose Aggada addresses the 7 mitzvot bnai noach therefore refers to the ger toshav of the Torah. Mesechta Baba Kama whose Halacha rules that an Israel exempt to pay damages to a Nacree for damages inflicted upon his goods or person – this mesechta refers to Canaani in the Book of D’varim. Therefore the idea that Ger Toshav/Bnai Noach refers to all Goyim in all lands, utterly absurd.
Therefore its patently false for anyone, especially Goyim or even later Jews, to declare that Torah commands belief in a Universal God when the Talmud teaches that only Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai and that both Yishmael and Esau rejected the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. That Goyim living in Goyim lands – if they profane the 7 mitzvot bnai noach – that a non existent Sanhedrin can put them to death for violating these 7 mitzvot while these Goyim live under the court authority of their own nations! Therefore Torah does not command monotheism. Monotheism profanes the 2nd Sinai commandment.
LikeLike
A clear example how the Rambam Yad avoda zara worshipped Islam’s false notion of some Universal ONE God Monotheism nonsense.
The 10 plagues judged the Gods of Egypt. Elijah confronted the priests who worshipped Baal! The notion that the Torah commands monotheism confuses Islam with Torah. Flat out just that simple. The Talmud states that the Goyim rejected the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Goyim do not worship their own Gods? Of course Goyim worship their own Gods. Since Goyim do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, therefore Goyim by definition worship other Gods.
Many societies have their own deities and religious systems, which can be seen as a form of polytheism. Hinduism clearly proves that Islamic monotheism – false. The seven mitzvot bnai Noach refers to gere toshav temporary residents living within the borders of Judea. It does not teach the absurd notion of some Universal God. Islam teaches this avoda zarah.
For a ger toshav to violate one of the 7 mitzvot – this qualifies as a Capital Crime/death penalty offence. Only a Sanhedrin court could judicate a Capital Crime/death penalty case. The jurisdiction of all Sanhedrin courts, only within the borders of Judea. Hence the absurd notion that the 7 mitzvot Bnai Noach applies Universally to all Goyim, simply pie in the sky bat shit crazy.
The Torah in the Book of D’varim defines two types of Goyim; the ger toshav in mesechta Sanhedrin and the Nacree/Canaani in Baba Kama. Concerning treif meat the Book of D’varim writes: permitted to give the treif meat to the ger toshav or sell the treif meat to the Canaani. The Talmud defines the Chumash. It does not rule independent from the Written Torah Constitutional Mandate.
Mesechta Sanhedrin whose Aggada addresses the 7 mitzvot bnai noach therefore refers to the ger toshav of the Torah. Mesechta Baba Kama whose Halacha rules that an Israel exempt to pay damages to a Nacree for damages inflicted upon his goods or person – this mesechta refers to Canaani in the Book of D’varim. Therefore the idea that Ger Toshav/Bnai Noach refers to all Goyim in all lands, utterly absurd.
Therefore its patently false for anyone, especially Goyim or even later Jews, to declare that Torah commands belief in a Universal God when the Talmud teaches that only Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai and that both Yishmael and Esau rejected the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. That Goyim living in Goyim lands – if they profane the 7 mitzvot bnai noach – that a non existent Sanhedrin can put them to death for violating these 7 mitzvot while these Goyim live under the court authority of their own nations! Therefore Torah does not command monotheism. Monotheism profanes the 2nd Sinai commandment.
LikeLike
קידושין
Vector bearing azimuths in both T’NaCH and Talmud to make inductive logic case/rule comparison between similar judicial cases. Prophets, they serve as the shotrim of the Shoftim of the Sanhedrin Federal courtrooms. These prophetic shotrim serve as the enforcers of Sanhedrin court judicial rulings. Prophets do not exist separate or divorced from serving as shotrim police enforcers of Sanhedrin common law judicial rulings. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n.
דתני האיש מקדש. מה שדה מקניא בחליפין אף אשה נמי מקניא
Legal mechanisms of acquisition (kinyan), an abstract idea rather than a physical acquisition. The act of acquisition entails the husband acquiring title to the Name of the future born children which this marital union will ideally produce. Hence the symbolic “exchange” involves not the woman herself but rather the acquisition of the unborn children born into the future or O’lam Ha’bah of this marital union.
The depth of the legal and symbolic meanings behind kinyan-acquistitions in the context of marriage, basically a Man cannot love that which he does not own. The basic standard Torah definition for “Love” as a secondary Torah precedent commandment. It illustrates that marital acquisition – rejects treating the woman as property. But rather about establishing a framework for family, legacy, and spiritual continuity of the oath brit-chosen Cohen seed of the Avot.
Our Gemara now makes a study of T’NaCH kabbalah prophetic mussar sources which shall in their turn require making bearing azimuth precedent comparison similar cases. Its this wisdom of Torah scholarship which ties Talmudic common law with T’NaCH prophetic mussar common law.
Upon this chief cornerstone common law sh’itta of Torah scholarship all generations have “this” obligation from their fathers to learn. A man acquires his wife in the name of producing children and educating those future born children in the faith to righteously pursue judicial justice among our Cohen people.
The first precedent דברים כד:א: “כי יקח איש אשה”, this פרט resides within the sugya כלל of כד:א – ד. This sugya linked to the three earlier sugyot כג:כב-כד וכג:כה. וכג:כו. The subject matter of these three small sugyot vows, respect of a neighbors property and goods as does likewise the next single p’suk sugya. Our p’suk כד:א addresses כי מצא בה ערות דבר וכתב לא ספר כריתת. The דיוק made from this pasuk, just as get defined as a mitzva from the Torah so too קידושין a mitzva from the Torah. The acquisition of קידושין once profaned through a divorce cannot thereafter be acquired again. Just as a korban, once dedicated for a Shoah offering, this korban cannot later be substituted for some other korban dedication, such as an asham dedication. Once a man acquires title to the Nefesh O’lam Ha’bah soul of his wife, even God himself cannot intervene and father a child from this woman! A distinctly unique idea which the Greek God Zeus did when he fathered Hercules from a married woman.
In Greek & New Testament mythology, divine intervention often disrupts human relationships and moral boundaries. Jewish judicial common law emphasizes the sanctity of marriage and the importance of fidelity. The notion that a husband acquires the soul of his wife and that this bond protected by a Torah oath alliance, reflects the seriousness with which Jewish law treats marriage. קידושין emphasizes the importance of fidelity, commitment, and the spiritual dimensions of the marital relationship visa-vis tohor time-oriented commandments which continuously create the chosen Cohen people יש מאין.
This Torah wisdom reinforces the values of respect and responsibility within the context of family and community. The pasuk בראשית כג:יז located within the larger sugya of בראשית כג:א-כ. Sarah did not survive the horrors of the Akedah, where Yitzak swore an oath brit that if HaShem would save the chosen Cohen seed from shoah, that he dedicates the O’lam Ha’bah life of his future born seed to do Torah mitzvot as the defining cultural trait of the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot.
Avraham refers to himself as a גר תושב person of status. Interesting any גר תושב accepts, while living inside the borders of Judea, to keep the 7 mitzvot bnai noach. Why? Observance of commandments, specifically גרי תושב commandments as defined in Masechet Sanhedrin, referred thereafter as the 7 mitzvot bnai Noach, this temporary Torah obligation permits the גר תושב to sue an Israel for damages in a Jewish court of law. By contrast the Nacree/Canaani, as defined in masechet Baba Kama, did not enjoy the judicial legal protections enjoyed by the ger toshav.
Therefore our Av Mishna likewise comes to distinguish and define the rights of women in Torah common law. A ordinary woman does not possess the legal right to acquire a Man, except and unless she qualifies as a significant status, such as being a tribal chief. For example: the prophetess Devorah as a sho’ter The concept of judicial authority existed during the time of Deborah. Both Moshe and Yehoshua established the 6 cities of refuge with their Small Sanhedrin courtrooms.
Deborah served as a judge and prophetess in Israel, leading her people during a time of oppression. The Aggadic story found in the Book of שופטים (פרק ד וה), which depicts her as a leader who inspired Barak to lead the Israelites against the Canaanite army. Prophets forever and always serve as the shot’rim of the sanhedrin common law courtrooms. This fundamental נפקא מינא both the fraudulent counterfeit books NT and Koran failed to discern.
Abraham’s acquisition of the Cave wherein he buried Sarah compares to the mitzva of קידושין, ideally both sets of acquisitions shall permanently maintain this status. The status of a married woman, higher than the status of a virgin unmarried woman. The NT virgin Mary theology perverts this Torah priority all together into a foreign alien Av tuma avoda zarah religion.
The pasuk ירמיה לב:כה contained inside the larger sugya כלל: לב:טז-כה. The comparison of Avraham as a גר תושב to the people of Canaan compares to Israel invaded by the Armies of Babylon. Avraham demanded to pay the full price for Sarah’s burial plot due to his outright distrust of the faithfulness of the nations of Canaan. Israel to in the days of Yirmeyahu failed to rule the oath sworn lands with righteous judicial justice. Its judges accepted bribes and perverted law.
T’NaCH common law requires Torah scholars to shoot a bearing azimuth and find a comparable Case/Din prophetic mussar. This Torah wisdom in essence defines how to study T’NaCH Primary Sources through the skill of learning by means of comparing similar Case/Din rulings. A similar mussar Case/Din ירמיה ח:יג-יז. The דיוק learned from קידושין, divorce and the Torah curse of g’lut. Herein this T’NaCH kabbalah frames the k’vanna of the tohor time oriented Torah commandment of קידושין.
T’NaCH common law requires Torah scholars to shoot a bearing azimuth and find a comparable Case/Din prophetic mussar. This Torah wisdom in essence defines how to study T’NaCH Primary Sources through the skill of learning by means of comparing similar Case/Din rulings. A similar mussar Case/Din ירמיה ח:יג-יז. The דיוק learned from קידושין, divorce and the Torah curse of g’lut. Herein this T’NaCH kabbalah frames the k’vanna of the tohor time oriented Torah commandment of קידושין.
תני האשה נקנית וניתני התם האיש קונה. מעיקא תני לישנא דאורייתא ולבסוף תני לישנא דרבנן. ומאי לישנא דרבנן דאמר לה אשה קנויה לעולם מהקדש וניתני הכא דאיש קינה משום דקא בעי למיתנא סיפא וקונה את אצמה
What does the language אשה קנויה לעולם מהקדש? This refers to the oath brit sworn between the pieces wherein HaShem cut a brit with Avram that his future born Cohen seed would number the stars in the heavens for multitude. Torah common law always learns by means of prior precedent rulings. Any attempt to read the Talmud, as if it existed as a common book of pleasurable reading, like fiction – utterly false. The Talmud stands upon the mandate of the Torah as the working Constitution of the Republic. Upon this יסוד both the T’NaCH and Talmud stand. Just as the mitzva of קידושין represents a permanent status so too and how much more so the Torah as the Constitution of the Republic stands as a permanent status. The transformation of קידושין as a rabbinic commandment likewise changed the status of the Torah away from a Constitutional basic law document unto a religious law of ritual observances as codified in the Shulkan Aruch. The one bears no resemblance to the other any more than a bastard child born from adultery, resembles the profaned husband’s relationship with his wife.
LikeLike
I think Moses, with few words, would have you executed.
LikeLike
Noise. You do not speak Hebrew.
LikeLike
A quick summation of the Yom Kippur dedication of the Divine Soul Name אלהים to the Shemene Ezeret dedication of the Divine Soul Name איש האלהים.
מלכים ב ו:טז-יז. Elisha when surrounded by Syrian soldiers, his servant expressed great fear. Elisha reassured him by saying that more stood with them than with the Syrians. He then davvened for his servant’s eyes acknowledge the new creation consequence of the prophet’s tohor time-oriented commandment, great numbers of heavenly army of angels surrounding them, causing the Syrian soldiers to flee in panic.
What defines the k’vanna of the נעילה תפלה in the Yom Kippur מחזור? Contrast this question to Shemene Ezeret where Yidden complete the reading of the Torah and start the Book of בראשית. How does the Torah reveal prophesy? An incredibly basic fundamental question, which neither the NT nor Koran ever asked. The latter av tumah avoda zarah religious abominations pervert prophesy to witchcraft; Bil’aam predicted the future.
Prophets, starting with Moshe Rabbeinu’s Torah command mussar – the NaCH Books of the Prophets do not pretend to for-see future events, which defines how the NT and Koran Protocols of the Elders of Zion hoax forgeries understand prophesy. This error every bit as big as “Theological Monotheism” – belief in some Universal One God.
The Talmud clearly instructs that HaShem offered the Torah revelation to both Esau and Yishmael. Both inquired to its contents which commanded not to murder or steal. Only the 12 tribes of Israel therefore stood at Sinai and accepted the Torah. Hence 1. assimilation and 2. intermarriage, both these critical Torah precedents/בניני אבות defines the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment negative commandment not to worship foreign gods; how this negative commandment כללי understands/מאי נפקא מינא the Av time oriented-first Sinai commandment.
The 2nd Sinai commandment משנה תורה\common law precedent defines the revelation of Torah common law revelation at Sinai which only the Tribes of Israel accepted making HaShem a tribal god of the chosen Cohen People. Contrast the Hadith being sayings of Muhammad exists as statute law rather than common law.
Statute law based upon legal authority figures like government officials. Common law compares similar courtroom rulings made by different courts of common law. Therefore, Hadith qualifies as legislative statute law, something like a law passed by the British Parliament rather than judicial common law which have a Constitutional Torah mandate to regulate all Legislative statute laws through the process of Legislative review known in the second name of the Book of דברים as משנה תורה/judicial common law.
Moshe Rabbeinu’s father-in-law/Yitro first advised Moshe how to ruling his people throughout the generation through the establishment of common law courtrooms which have the Torah constitutional mandate to regulate all statute law passed by any other branch of the Federal Government. The 12 Tribes of Israel established the first Republic when the prophet Yehoshua conquered Canaan.
The Torah includes both statute-like commandments (mitzvot) and legal precedents (case laws) that function similarly to common law. Mitzvot as statute-like commandments, both positive and negative mitzvot — do not require k’vanna. K’vanna defined as the dedication of tohor Oral Torah Horev revelation middot, affixed מקום קבוע to Torah mitzvot and Talmudic halachot; specifically, the rabbinic mitzva of tefillat Shemone Esrei. Herein defines the basis of dedicating Divine Names for the souls/life dedicated while standing before a Sefer Torah and swearing a Torah oath/blessing. (Blessings exist as תולדות to Torah oaths based upon the 2nd tier תולדות מצוות in their relationship with Av tohor time-oriented commandments – תמיד מעשה בראשית.)
In the specific case of Av kre’a shma tefillah to תולדות Shemone Esrei tefillah, the שחרית first blessing to the קריא שמע address the k’vanna of Av tohor time-oriented commandments through the twice repeated רמז term תמיד מעשה בראשית. The four part פרדס inductive reasoning kabbala of Oral Torah does not recognize as particularly significant worshipping words printed in either the T’NaCH Talmud or the Siddur.
This opening kre’a shma blessing/oath\, made for example by and through tefillen, either Rashi or Rabbeinu Tam, or mixing part of one with part of the other, which permits larger tefillen boxes. This latter sh’itta helps to understand the מחלוכת concerning when to say תפילה דאורייתא ערבית between Rashi and Rabbeinu Tam. This dispute likewise explains how rabbi Yeshua could answer the ערבית תפילה could exist as both חיוב ורשות as one Torah commandment!
רשות commandments traditionally misinterpreted as “optional”. The rabbis, in the case of women placing tefillen, a tohor time-oriented commandment, as optional – meaning secondary, having a lower level of holiness. Rabbi Yehoshua one of the instructors of rabbi Akiva, he did not recognize this false טיפש פשט. Herein we reach the Order of תפלה נעילה on Yom Kippur. The dedication of the Divine Chyyah soul name אלהים.
Have reached a מאי נפקא מינא – “gee I could have had a V-8″ moment. Rabbeinu Tam rules the halacha poskined from the opening Av Mishna of ברכות, permissible to dav-ven תפילת ערבית at פלג המנחה while the Sun remains visible in the sky. Tefillen traditionally limited to a day-light Torah commandment. Consequently, a person can reverse the mixture of Rashi/Rabbeinu Tam tefillens placed during the שחרית קריא שמע דאורייתא תפילה. That person has the רשות to then dav’ven the קריא שמע ערבית תפילה דאורייתא with the intention to affix this kre’a shma to his נעילה תפלת דרבנן שמונה עשרה. As a consequence this person dav’vens both שחרית וערבית with tefillen!
Tefillen as a mitzva permits a person to swear a Torah oath. The Gemara of Sanhedrin learns that sworn false oaths caused the floods in the days of Noach. Yom Kippur remembers the t’shuva made by HaShem wherein HaShem annulled the vow to make of the seed of Moshe the chosen Cohen people. Possible to annul a vow, not so a Torah oath!
Herein we can understand the holiness of the repetition of the Shemone Esrei wherein the Angels declare Holy Holy Holy. What defines the Torah concept of Angels? Clearly the Koran does not have the slightest clue. Proof that Muhammad a false prophet. Angels created through swearing Torah oath which require שם ומלכות. Kingship gives a direction taken by a people through the leadership of the king himself. Impossible to define a term using the identical term!
Kingship in this context therefore refers to the dedication of some specific Oral Torah tohor spirit revealed first to Moshe at Horev – 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf on Yom Kippur. What does this Oral Torah dedicated through swearing a Torah oath create? Answer – Angels. The Torah תפילה דאורייתא תפילה – קריא שמע accepts the yoke of the kingdom of heaven upon the oath created Angels – created through the sworn שם ומלכות שבועה. Herein distinguishes a Torah blessing from a Torah praise. The latter expressed through saying Tehillem prayers. Grasping such subtle distinctions defines רב חסד-מאי נפקא מינא.
Shemene Ezeret dedication of the Divine Soul Name איש האלהים, the k’vanna of this closing 4th Torah Chag, to dedicate the k’vanna of HaShem as KING over the Angels created through swearing Av tohor time-oriented Torah commandments תמיד מעשה בראשית.
The Torah opens with the Divine Soul name אלהים rather than the שם השם לשמה first revealed in the opening Sinai Torah commandment. Why? The Chosen First Born Cohen People yet created through observance of tohor Av time-oriented commandments. Hence the Torah opens by describing the world as chaos and anarchy as depicted through the oppression of giants who raped women, the building of the Tower of Bavil, and the destruction of the cities of Sodom.
This point of distinction separates the mitzva of Amalek told in שמות from the mitzva of Amalek told in דברים. A clear example of the Book of the Torah teaching prophetic mussar through משנה תורה common law legalism. D’varim introduces that the Jewish ערב רב — אין להם יראת אלהים.
ערב רב שיצאו ממזרים אין להם יראת אלהים as told in the mitzva to remember the eternal war against Amalek one shabbat prior to Purim, the custom to read this Torah passage. The mussar of דאורייתא Chag Purim places the essence of the commandment concerning Amalek upon the Jewish people not to become an Av tumah avoda zara which assimilates and intermarries with Goyim. Anti-Semitism defines the eternal war against Amalek. This eternal war an internal Civil War against Jews who worship Av tumah avoda zarah.
The Divine Names function as oath soul Names of the chosen Cohen people in the image of HaShem. The closing Chag of Shemene Ezeret actively entails remembering, based upon ר”ה יום הזכרון. Man lives and dies by the Angels or demons which tohor vs tuma middot continually create תמיד מעשה בראשית. This judicial revelation (משנה תורה) forms the soul of prophecy and defines Torah’s political-legal distinction from every other system.
LikeLike
And only because the Jewish community doesnt execute you for blaspheming the Messiah or engaging in ritual oral sex with children, drinking their circumcision blood, or sodomizing boys under 9 and girls under three, therefore God raises up gentiles to kill you through war and persecution just like God himself raised up Nebuchadnezzar to slaughter and exile you for such wickedness., and especially for twisting His holy word to rationalize your unholy lusts that you indulge in most pridefully.
Violence unlike never before is coming for Jewry. When this final war begins, realize that it comes to destroy your people for their continual blasphemy of Yeshua. The violence comes to purge such rebellion from your heart, and to save a Messianic Remnant who await the appearance of Yeshua.
Those who exalt their own language above the Logos who spoke the universe into existence will be destroyed without mercy in the end.
Don’t forsake your own mercy.
I don’t believe in a thoroughly Jewish Messiah: 7th day Sabbath and the moedim, kashrut, beards, tzitziot, head coverings on married women, BUT NOT YOUR CONSUMPTION OF POWDERED BLOOD FOR MAGICAL PURPOSES, NOT YOU ORAL TRADITIONS (especially not satanic oral sex on freshly circumcised penises), NOR ROME’S ORAL TRADITIONS, NOR BYZANTIUM’S ORAL TRADITIONS.
TO HELL WITH YOUR FILTHY, FOUL, TRACTS OF STINKING DECEIT!
TO HELL WITH YOUR TALMUD!
ETERNAL CURSES REST HEAVY ON IT !
MAY GOD HAVE MERCY ON YOUR SOUL AND BLESS IT WITH A TRUE SPIRIT OF WISDOM AND REVELATION IN THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE MESSIAH WHO WAS CRUCIFIED FOR SIN AND RAISED THE THIRD DAY
“TO THE LAW AND TESTIMONY!”
LikeLike
[[[And only because the Jewish community doesnt execute you for blaspheming the Messiah or engaging in ritual oral sex with children, drinking their circumcision blood, or sodomizing boys under 9 and girls under three, therefore God raises up gentiles to kill you through war and persecution just like God himself raised up Nebuchadnezzar to slaughter and exile you for such wickedness., and especially for twisting His holy word to rationalize your unholy lusts that you indulge in most pridefully]]]
Precise example of evil eye, Av tumah avoda zarah. Where was JeZeus during the Shoah? Dead God, Dead religion. Proof: its followers vomit to this day slander like the above.
LikeLike
A quick summation of the Yom Kippur dedication of the Divine Soul Name אלהים to the Shemene Ezeret dedication of the Divine Soul Name איש האלהים.
מלכים ב ו:טז-יז. Elisha when surrounded by Syrian soldiers, his servant expressed great fear. Elisha reassured him by saying that more stood with them than with the Syrians. He then davvened for his servant’s eyes acknowledge the new creation consequence of the prophet’s tohor time-oriented commandment, great numbers of heavenly army of angels surrounding them, causing the Syrian soldiers to flee in panic.
What defines the k’vanna of the נעילה תפלה in the Yom Kippur מחזור? Contrast this question to Shemene Ezeret where Yidden complete the reading of the Torah and start the Book of בראשית. How does the Torah reveal prophesy? An incredibly basic fundamental question, which neither the NT nor Koran ever asked. The latter av tumah avoda zarah religious abominations pervert prophesy to witchcraft; Bil’aam predicted the future.
Prophets, starting with Moshe Rabbeinu’s Torah command mussar – the NaCH Books of the Prophets do not pretend to for-see future events, which defines how the NT and Koran Protocols of the Elders of Zion hoax forgeries understand prophesy. This error every bit as big as “Theological Monotheism” – belief in some Universal One God.
The Talmud clearly instructs that HaShem offered the Torah revelation to both Esau and Yishmael. Both inquired to its contents which commanded not to murder or steal. Only the 12 tribes of Israel therefore stood at Sinai and accepted the Torah. Hence 1. assimilation and 2. intermarriage, both these critical Torah precedents/בניני אבות defines the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment negative commandment not to worship foreign gods; how this negative commandment כללי understands/מאי נפקא מינא the Av time oriented-first Sinai commandment.
The 2nd Sinai commandment משנה תורה\common law precedent defines the revelation of Torah common law revelation at Sinai which only the Tribes of Israel accepted making HaShem a tribal god of the chosen Cohen People. Contrast the Hadith being sayings of Muhammad exists as statute law rather than common law.
Statute law based upon legal authority figures like government officials. Common law compares similar courtroom rulings made by different courts of common law. Therefore, Hadith qualifies as legislative statute law, something like a law passed by the British Parliament rather than judicial common law which have a Constitutional Torah mandate to regulate all Legislative statute laws through the process of Legislative review known in the second name of the Book of דברים as משנה תורה/judicial common law.
Moshe Rabbeinu’s father-in-law/Yitro first advised Moshe how to ruling his people throughout the generation through the establishment of common law courtrooms which have the Torah constitutional mandate to regulate all statute law passed by any other branch of the Federal Government. The 12 Tribes of Israel established the first Republic when the prophet Yehoshua conquered Canaan.
The Torah includes both statute-like commandments (mitzvot) and legal precedents (case laws) that function similarly to common law. Mitzvot as statute-like commandments, both positive and negative mitzvot — do not require k’vanna. K’vanna defined as the dedication of tohor Oral Torah Horev revelation middot, affixed מקום קבוע to Torah mitzvot and Talmudic halachot; specifically, the rabbinic mitzva of tefillat Shemone Esrei. Herein defines the basis of dedicating Divine Names for the souls/life dedicated while standing before a Sefer Torah and swearing a Torah oath/blessing. (Blessings exist as תולדות to Torah oaths based upon the 2nd tier תולדות מצוות in their relationship with Av tohor time-oriented commandments – תמיד מעשה בראשית.)
In the specific case of Av kre’a shma tefillah to תולדות Shemone Esrei tefillah, the שחרית first blessing to the קריא שמע address the k’vanna of Av tohor time-oriented commandments through the twice repeated רמז term תמיד מעשה בראשית. The four part פרדס inductive reasoning kabbala of Oral Torah does not recognize as particularly significant worshipping words printed in either the T’NaCH Talmud or the Siddur.
This opening kre’a shma blessing/oath\, made for example by and through tefillen, either Rashi or Rabbeinu Tam, or mixing part of one with part of the other, which permits larger tefillen boxes. This latter sh’itta helps to understand the מחלוכת concerning when to say תפילה דאורייתא ערבית between Rashi and Rabbeinu Tam. This dispute likewise explains how rabbi Yeshua could answer the ערבית תפילה could exist as both חיוב ורשות as one Torah commandment!
רשות commandments traditionally misinterpreted as “optional”. The rabbis, in the case of women placing tefillen, a tohor time-oriented commandment, as optional – meaning secondary, having a lower level of holiness. Rabbi Yehoshua one of the instructors of rabbi Akiva, he did not recognize this false טיפש פשט. Herein we reach the Order of תפלה נעילה on Yom Kippur. The dedication of the Divine Chyyah soul name אלהים.
Have reached a מאי נפקא מינא – “gee I could have had a V-8″ moment. Rabbeinu Tam rules the halacha poskined from the opening Av Mishna of ברכות, permissible to dav-ven תפילת ערבית at פלג המנחה while the Sun remains visible in the sky. Tefillen traditionally limited to a day-light Torah commandment. Consequently, a person can reverse the mixture of Rashi/Rabbeinu Tam tefillens placed during the שחרית קריא שמע דאורייתא תפילה. That person has the רשות to then dav’ven the קריא שמע ערבית תפילה דאורייתא with the intention to affix this kre’a shma to his נעילה תפלת דרבנן שמונה עשרה. As a consequence this person dav’vens both שחרית וערבית with tefillen!
Tefillen as a mitzva permits a person to swear a Torah oath. The Gemara of Sanhedrin learns that sworn false oaths caused the floods in the days of Noach. Yom Kippur remembers the t’shuva made by HaShem wherein HaShem annulled the vow to make of the seed of Moshe the chosen Cohen people. Possible to annul a vow, not so a Torah oath!
Herein we can understand the holiness of the repetition of the Shemone Esrei wherein the Angels declare Holy Holy Holy. What defines the Torah concept of Angels? Clearly the Koran does not have the slightest clue. Proof that Muhammad a false prophet. Angels created through swearing Torah oath which require שם ומלכות. Kingship gives a direction taken by a people through the leadership of the king himself. Impossible to define a term using the identical term!
Kingship in this context therefore refers to the dedication of some specific Oral Torah tohor spirit revealed first to Moshe at Horev – 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf on Yom Kippur. What does this Oral Torah dedicated through swearing a Torah oath create? Answer – Angels. The Torah תפילה דאורייתא תפילה – קריא שמע accepts the yoke of the kingdom of heaven upon the oath created Angels – created through the sworn שם ומלכות שבועה. Herein distinguishes a Torah blessing from a Torah praise. The latter expressed through saying Tehillem prayers. Grasping such subtle distinctions defines רב חסד-מאי נפקא מינא.
Shemene Ezeret dedication of the Divine Soul Name איש האלהים, the k’vanna of this closing 4th Torah Chag, to dedicate the k’vanna of HaShem as KING over the Angels created through swearing Av tohor time-oriented Torah commandments תמיד מעשה בראשית.
The Torah opens with the Divine Soul name אלהים rather than the שם השם לשמה first revealed in the opening Sinai Torah commandment. Why? The Chosen First Born Cohen People yet created through observance of tohor Av time-oriented commandments. Hence the Torah opens by describing the world as chaos and anarchy as depicted through the oppression of giants who raped women, the building of the Tower of Bavil, and the destruction of the cities of Sodom.
This point of distinction separates the mitzva of Amalek told in שמות from the mitzva of Amalek told in דברים. A clear example of the Book of the Torah teaching prophetic mussar through משנה תורה common law legalism. D’varim introduces that the Jewish ערב רב — אין להם יראת אלהים.
ערב רב שיצאו ממזרים אין להם יראת אלהים as told in the mitzva to remember the eternal war against Amalek one shabbat prior to Purim, the custom to read this Torah passage. The mussar of דאורייתא Chag Purim places the essence of the commandment concerning Amalek upon the Jewish people not to become an Av tumah avoda zara which assimilates and intermarries with Goyim. Anti-Semitism defines the eternal war against Amalek. This eternal war an internal Civil War against Jews who worship Av tumah avoda zarah.
The Divine Names function as oath soul Names of the chosen Cohen people in the image of HaShem. The closing Chag of Shemene Ezeret actively entails remembering, based upon ר”ה יום הזכרון. Man lives and dies by the Angels or demons which tohor vs tuma middot continually create תמיד מעשה בראשית. This judicial revelation (משנה תורה) forms the soul of prophecy and defines Torah’s political-legal distinction from every other system.
LikeLike
Blood Libels defines the Yatzir Ha’Raw spirits within the hearts of all Goyim throughout the generations. Post the Oct 7th Abomination massacre by Hamas, almost immediately came the blood libel slander of “Genocide”. But post the ’67 War the blood libel revisionist history introduced by both Britain and France: the 242 declaration that peace only achievable in the Middle East through a UN “internatioanal law” dictate upon Israel!
The semantic shift in the phrase “territoires occupés” between 1964 and post-1967 UN usage exposes the deliberate retroactive redefinition that Arab and European diplomats engineered after the Six-Day War. The Palestine National Covenant (1964)—ratified three years before 242—defines “Palestine” as the “occupied” land within the British Mandate borders, excluding the West Bank (then under Jordanian sovereignty) and Gaza (under Egyptian control).
Weigh now the hostile blood libel language of “the” French UN 242 post war revisionist history. The French official text uses “des territoires occupés” — which in French usage is normally read as “from “the” occupied territories” (i.e., with “the” definite sense). That phrasing more naturally supports the French holier than thou, reading that Israel should withdraw from the territories (the entirety of those occupied in 1948! The French wording and the preamble’s “inadmissibility of acquisition of territory by war” buttress an interpretation that envisages full withdrawal, which includes even West Jerusalem! Recall the Vatican demanded in 1947 the Jerusalem exist as an Internationally ruled City, similar to Post WWII Berlin. Many continental and Arab states, and many subsequent UN framings, preferred this reading.
The French text gave political cover to states and blocs pressing for “the” full Israeli withdrawal from “48 occupied territories”; the English text gave the drafters (Caradon, Goldberg et al.) a way to frame 242 as a negotiating framework rather than an immediate, absolute mandate for total withdrawal from ’67 “recaptured territories”. A fundamental presumption by both London and Paris. Both versions fundamentally err. Israel simply not a UN protectorate territory wherein the UN determines its borders like as attempted by the Peel Commission. Britain and France, nor any other UN Security Council States, determine the international borders of Israel. And how much more so the Capital City of Israel. Yet these hostile states promote revisionist history and refuse to recognize Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel! Both versions of UN 242 an utter fraud.
Hence the distinction between the British and French versions of 242 represents a Good Cop vs. Bad Cop propaganda rhetoric to justify the dismantling of Zionism’s pre WWI platform that Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. All Arab Israeli Wars ever fought, including the Oct 7th Abomination War reflects the Blood Libel Racism spirits which breaths within the Yatzir Ha’Raw hearts of all Goyim – both Arab/Muslims and European/Russians.
LikeLike